My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 041316
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2016
>
PC 041316
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2017 2:34:09 PM
Creation date
8/11/2017 2:29:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
4/13/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
think that this does reduce the perception of grading and actual apparent grading that's <br />happening on this site even if it's viewed not straight on or viewed from an angle. Again, <br />not a huge difference, but we think it's noticeable and was worth exploring. <br />Commissioner Nagler: But noticeable only to the period that the vegetation is growing, <br />right, until it matures? It's that interim period, right? <br />Weinstein: Yes. <br />Commissioner Nagler: Okay, thank you. <br />Commissioner Balch: I agree with Commissioner Nagler's comment. I initially thought I <br />was supportive of staff's recommendation to reduce, but after hearing the applicant and <br />kind of thinking about it and obviously looking at the circular drive and hearing the <br />comment about no off - street parking or no off - property parking, I'm tending to lean in <br />support of the applicant, as designed. My only comment to that or to try to help address <br />concerns would be that we look at the sizes of the boxes of the three trees that are <br />going to be planted on the front there and maybe we upsize those. <br />Chair Ritter: I'm hearing a lot of give and take. You've worked with the applicant and <br />worked with the neighbor, have done some tweaks here and there, and I'm in favor of <br />recommending approval and I like what Commissioner Balch suggested. I'm more <br />concerned about the vegetation and visual trees that the neighbor looks at straight out <br />of their window. I'm not sure if that's part of the conditions of approval, or we just make <br />sure that's included if a motion is made? <br />Commissioner Balch: Well, if I may, I had one other quick note which was that I did not <br />see in the conditions any requirement for recycled water to be used during the <br />construction period. I don't know if that's a standard request of staff nowadays or not, <br />but given the size of the grading, I would suggest making that a condition as well. We <br />had a condition on the prior item. I think it was Condition No. 19 that we could lift the <br />language off. From my view, I don't know the box size of the trees being proposed, but I <br />would maybe leave the upsizing to the Director of Community Development, and then <br />add the condition regarding the use of recycled water during construction. <br />Commissioner Balch moved to approve P16 -0006, 39 Silver Oaks Court, subject <br />to the Conditions of Approval as shown in Exhibit A of the Staff Report, with the <br />addition of a condition that recycled water be used during the construction <br />process as coordinated by the Director of Community Development, a <br />modification of Condition No. 7 to say that the three trees located in front of the <br />retaining wall be upsized at the direction and determination of the Director of <br />Community Development, and to strike Condition No. 5 with reduction to a <br />30 -foot area and go with `as proposed.' <br />Commissioner Allen seconded the motion. <br />ROLL CALL VOTE: <br />AYES: Commissioners Allen, Balch, O'Connor, Nagler, and Ritter <br />NOES: None <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, April 13, 2016 Page 21 of 33 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.