My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 042716
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2016
>
PC 042716
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2017 2:31:43 PM
Creation date
8/11/2017 2:25:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
4/27/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
proper articulation which we really never talked about but I'm going to say as an aside —the <br />difference between this and the homes that have been built next to Safeway —I don't mean <br />to be critical. I wasn't around when that was approved —those are monolithic rectangles. <br />These are more interesting articulated structures which won't have the feel and look of <br />being as dense as those structures next to Safeway, but having said that, I'm also saying I <br />think there's too many of them, right? <br />But just to be clear, I could probably surprise myself and vote for a project with less concern <br />that has been expressed about the RHNA impacts, sensitive to the fact that there is an <br />interaction between what the community represented by Sunflower Hill represents and the <br />fact that these are relatively affordable houses, but it would have to be a substantially <br />reconfigured development. <br />Chair Ritter: This is a workshop so we're exploring ideas and getting feedback and I don't <br />think we have all the answers yet. In general, I'm not supportive of making amendments to <br />the General Plan and Specific Plan in general because they spent a lot of time putting those <br />together; however, I am supportive of filling a need in Pleasanton which I think is this <br />special needs need and 1 think that outweighs my other concern of not doing an <br />amendment. I do think there is a lot more to be studied on this. The traffic made me feel <br />what we could have with current zoning would be worse. That's not good. Water is a big <br />issue, but if they utilized this the way it is agricultural, there would be a lot more water usage <br />for the number of homes. <br />There is a need for workforce housing as well from what I understand for Pleasanton. We're <br />bringing Workday into town and there's just a lot of opportunities there, so I think there is a <br />need. And then the other big one is the Nevada cut - through street. If we could get the <br />developer to pay for some of this project that we're likely going to have to do because it's <br />worn out and rotting, I'd rather have someone else pay for it than our taxpayer dollars. So <br />that's why it moves up my chain of what I'm thinking is a priority because we have someone <br />that yes, they are going to build some homes, but we need to get something out of it that's <br />worth it for the City and the residents. <br />Commissioner O'Connor: So I feel the same way as David. I came in to this meeting <br />thinking we really shouldn't be making a General Plan Amendment. I said it many times <br />before. I don't think we should be rezoning for the benefit of the developer or for the project <br />de jure. You know, right now housing is the most expensive thing going so it's the most <br />desirable. We passed it over the General Plan before and the citizens of this town really <br />don't want any more development, of houses at least. They made that clear. We lost the <br />housing cap lawsuit, but the spirit is still there. They don't want to keep building and building <br />and building more homes. I really want to support Sunflower Hill though and that's one of <br />the reasons like David said, you might be able to support the project if it came back less <br />dense and a little more amenity but I think I'm swinging a little closer to Nancy. I don't think I <br />can support a General Plan Amendment. I know it's a great, great project for Sunflower Hill <br />and I know it would be a great amenity to the City. I would hope we could find another home <br />for it. I would hope we could find some of the dollars we used for senior housing to help our <br />disabled housing. We've done a lot of senior housing and I'm not saying that's a bad thing. <br />I'm saying we haven't done anything for the kids that need something and young adults and <br />even older adults that are disabled and need a place. So I think that should definitely be a <br />priority of ours because it's certainly a priority of the Council. But, right now, I don't even <br />know in 2022, but right now I don't think I could support a General Plan Amendment. <br />Commissioner Brown: I align a lot with what David said. I don't think it's fair for parents in <br />the room to ask them to wait until 2022. 1 don't know what other opportunities there might be <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, April 27, 2016 Page 38 of 43 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.