Laserfiche WebLink
Commissioner O'Connor: No, like 10 per house and do you know how many per 100 or <br />1,000 square feet? <br />Tassano: Let me see if I can find it real quick. It might be in here. 20, so 65,000 square feet <br />would be 2,100 trips. <br />Commissioner Nagler: Twice as many as anticipated. <br />Chair Ritter: But we get caught up in the difference. We say twice as many but if we're <br />going to 95 homes versus developing this as a commercial /industrial lot, it's not twice as <br />many as it would be if it were developed under your current zoning. It's a bit more. Is that <br />correct? <br />Tassano: It's less. <br />Chair Ritter: It's less for 95 homes. That's what I wanted to clarify. <br />Tassano: 1,000 daily trips with residential and 2,000 with the retail. <br />Chair Ritter: Right, so with the current zoning there would be more traffic, but rezoning to <br />95 homes there would be less traffic. <br />Tassano: Yes. <br />Commissioner Nagler: So here's what I don't know enough to be able to get a picture in my <br />head about, is we're constructing this high density housing across from McDonalds, and <br />you've determined obviously the number of daily trips, total trips and peak hour trips at <br />these various intersections, particularly the problematic intersection that you talked about at <br />the top of Ray Street, and now we're adding another 100 peak hour trips plus a total of <br />1,000 trips per day. What I can't quite understand is or can't get a picture of, how do those <br />two —even if they were anticipated theoretically, in real terms of someone sitting in their car, <br />sitting at the intersection, waiting for their turn, how do these two projects together change <br />the current traffic flow? That's my question. <br />Tassano: I can't give you definitive answers. I can bring that back, but the way we would <br />look at it is, the easiest way to look at it, from a driver perspective is how much longer you <br />have to wait at that signal. Do you currently wait 30 seconds and now you're going to wait <br />42 seconds? So 12 seconds is pretty significant. Our level of service standard where it's <br />unacceptable is if you have to wait more than 55 seconds. That's an average so if you wait <br />110 and someone else waits zero, then we're dead even from the last time. The 350 units, <br />because they're apartments, they generate fewer trips per day instead of the magic number <br />of 10 for single family. Apartments are 6. They also generate in the peak hour. They don't <br />generate 1. They generate .6 and so it's a little bit reduced. So it seems like, 350, oh my <br />gosh, that's 3 '/z times this development, right, but instead of 350 you go half which is 175 <br />and a bit more or call it 200, so call it 200 trips. This one does 100 trips in the p.m. and you <br />can see that roughly that 350 apartment complex which sounds huge and menacing <br />generates 200 trips and this would generate 100 trips. You do that same distribution where <br />you break out the in's and the out's and the directions they are going and then we look to <br />see what that difference is, but I don't have the exact number of seconds. I'm not sure how <br />much that is. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, April 27, 2016 Page 22 of 43 <br />