My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 042716
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2016
>
PC 042716
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2017 2:31:43 PM
Creation date
8/11/2017 2:25:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
4/27/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
when they get to my signal, then I have to turn it green for them and it stops the main flow of <br />traffic. I'd rather have them on my collector streets. So it kind of goes through residential but <br />no more than if they were on Valley Avenue going through residential. It's not really <br />through - residential as I envision it. <br />Commissioner Allen: You talked about peak hours being around 100 and the rule of thumb. <br />How about total daily traffic like on a Saturday? How many more trips for 100 homes will <br />there be? <br />Tassano: We go 10 for single family homes, so 1,000. <br />Commissioner Allen: So I'm looking at the Lund Ranch traffic summary. Essentially, this is <br />twice as much traffic as Lund Ranch, more or less? <br />Tassano: Yes, because they were about 43 and this is 95 <br />Commissioner Allen: So it's tough, I mean its more cars in a busy area <br />Tassano: Yes, and I think one of the things that I look at as a traffic engineer is, it doesn't <br />have to be developed, but we anticipate something to be developed. So even though it is <br />zoned as agricultural —those two properties —I have no vision that that was staying as <br />agricultural. So in my model that has been around since 2000 or so, we've always had it as <br />commercial right, because that's what it's also zoned as, commercial. Is that right? <br />Hagen: The General Plan Amendment? <br />Tassano: Yes, and so I had commercial on there and when we went through and did the <br />Housing Element, we switched that and we put the residential units on there, and that's <br />what we had them do in study because it was 2014 and really close into the Housing <br />Element. I think we had just approved it, but the volume is pretty much the same so we left <br />it as that. So that's what we had them analyze it at. So, yes it is new trips, but it is not <br />unanticipated trips. <br />Commissioner O'Connor: How many trips did you have when it was industrial? <br />Tassano: So it was commercial, which is retail, and it was 65,000 square feet which is a <br />little over I think about 200 peak hour trips. It's a little over 300 for retail, but the distribution <br />pattern has changed a bit so you have to kind of watch that. <br />Commissioner O'Connor: That was peak hour? <br />Tassano: Yes, it was p.m. peak hour. <br />Commissioner O'Connor: How many per day trips? <br />Tassano: I don't know. I don't memorize the daily stuff because.... <br />Commissioner O'Connor: You don't have a number for square feet? <br />Tassano: You mean like a magic number for daily? <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, April 27, 2016 Page 21 of 43 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.