My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 032316
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2016
>
PC 032316
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2017 2:30:13 PM
Creation date
8/11/2017 2:23:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
3/23/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
in inches really, but if it's important to the Commission, we can modify that standards <br />table and conditions of approval accordingly. <br />As far as the height of the buildings, the clarification of that, perhaps one of the Cindy <br />Way residents who are here tonight might have a better recall of that than I do because <br />they clearly have a big interest in that. I don't recall the houses being any higher, but <br />what I do recall is working very closely with the neighbors. They actually changed the <br />roof designs for the houses and we completely re- oriented a couple of the ridgelines to <br />improve views towards the ridge —not saying we're going to be completely opening up <br />those views or not blocking those views but we feel that in doing that design, we <br />substantially widen the corridor of view opportunities for those neighbors. So that's the <br />change in the design as I recall. <br />I'd like to just point out a couple of quick benefits for the project. I already mentioned the <br />elimination of the lift station and the extension of the water and the sewer to Valley <br />Avenue which has been long desired by the City of Pleasanton; the screening of the <br />Altieri property, the property owners have been there for some time and allowing the <br />protection that they need from potential impacts from the golf balls continuing to land on <br />their property which they currently do. So we see that as being a big benefit for that land <br />owner. There are no CEQA impacts. In fact, we got a letter from the Army Corps of <br />Engineers indicating there is a preliminary jurisdictional determination of low impact and <br />the remaining environmental clearance is very minor with respect to Fish and Wildlife, <br />so we're not impacting the Arroyo. The tree elimination issue will be minimal but we are <br />doing everything we can to protect the Arroyo dripline. In fact, as we get deeper into <br />some of those detailed drawings, I might have an opportunity to save some more trees <br />and that's always our goal because we like trees and it's a good selling point for our <br />buyers as well. <br />FAR, we've already talked about that and that is the precise response I would have <br />given that staff had presented to you. Last but not least is I think that by pre - plotting the <br />houses as we indicated, it gives clear commitment to the abutting property owners on <br />Cindy Way, who are the major stakeholders in this, so they know precisely what to <br />expect when we construct. So with that, unless the Commission has questions, that <br />concludes my presentation. <br />Chair Ritter: Any questions for the applicant? <br />Commissioner Allen: Just one question —on the screen trees Ms. Hardy, do you know <br />what the growth plan is? You said 40 to 50 feet was the objective. So in 5 years, do you <br />know the height of the trees versus 10 years roughly? <br />Hardy: I don't know off -hand what the growth rate is and of course, as you know, it <br />depends upon a lot of things. They are fast - growing trees. I just couldn't tell you what <br />the growth of rate is, but even if we did, it could vary, again, depending on the site <br />conditions. But we are again striving to get trees there. They'll be fast - growing that fit <br />within the Arroyo and they're going to give not only our future home buyers but <br />surrounding property owners some level of screening of that net. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, March 23, 2016 Page 8 of 46 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.