My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 032316
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2016
>
PC 032316
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2017 2:30:13 PM
Creation date
8/11/2017 2:23:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
3/23/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Ritter: All right, let's hear from the applicant. <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. <br />Pamela Hardy, Applicant (Ponderosa Homes): Good evening Chairman Ritter, <br />Commissioners and staff. I'm Pam Hardy with Ponderosa Homes and I'm joined this <br />evening by Jeff Schroeder, our Senior Vice President and Mark Falgout, RJA, our <br />Senior Civil Engineer. I'd like to thank staff for an excellent staff report and presentation. <br />I think she covered quite a bit of ground. I'd like to start if I might —I'll go a little out of <br />order here and perhaps answer some of the questions Commissioners had before I give <br />you my summary. These are in no particular order. <br />The 45 -foot high net that we're proposing between Phase 1 and Phase 2, as Jenny <br />pointed out, it is on Lot 17 which is part of our future Phase 2. It is substantially lower <br />than the net that would have otherwise been required along Rose Avenue which would <br />be in the neighborhood of about 135 -feet tall. So there's been a long, long discussion <br />with Jeff being the lead on that, with the operators of the driving range, the fairground <br />board, and representatives from Supervisor Nate Miley's office coming together with an <br />agreement that would also allow the infrastructure to run across a portion of the golf <br />range and continue out to Valley Avenue which I might add is a substantial benefit for <br />the City. By doing so, we are eliminating a planned lift station on Rose Avenue which <br />would be adjacent to houses on Cindy Way. So we see that as being a great benefit to <br />those existing neighbors as well as the City because it's a lesser cost. Also, they <br />wouldn't have the maintenance responsibility they would have if the lift station were to <br />be built. <br />The screen trees are in the 40- to- 50 -foot height range. We specifically worked with our <br />landscape architect to pick fast - growing trees because believe me when I say this, <br />Ponderosa has a very big interest in making sure that net screening is screened by <br />trees because we're going to be selling homes next to them. We'll continue to refine <br />that palette as we go along and make adjustments, but those trees would be planted <br />immediately on the installation of that screen structure so we'll get a little growth by the <br />time we build out the first phase of 16 lots. And clearly those trees will be in place <br />should those additional three lots in Phase 2 be built. Again, should the golf range <br />concession go away the property owners, the Altieri's, will retain ownership of that land <br />and ultimately make the decision to construct Phase 2. <br />As far as the easement with the fairgrounds, we do have an agreement signed by the <br />fair board and its procedure to ultimately go to the Board of Supervisors, but of course, <br />the County staff is going through their plan check process with their own engineering <br />staff. But, essentially the Board of Supervisors —it's perfunctory in nature that they <br />would sign the easement following the fairground board. <br />With respect to the heights of the building, staff is correct as is Commissioner Allen that <br />the development standards table does show 32 feet. Our homes are designed at <br />30 feet. We can modify that development standards table if you see the need for that. <br />Again, as Adam indicated, we like a little bit of wiggle room, because when we go from <br />the preliminary design, and Commissioner O'Connor understands this, when we go into <br />construction drawings, sometimes things happen where maybe the design of the roof <br />changes or there are other factors that come into play. I'm not talking in feet, I'm talking <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, March 23, 2016 Page 7 of 46 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.