My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 032316
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2016
>
PC 032316
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2017 2:30:13 PM
Creation date
8/11/2017 2:23:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
3/23/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Commissioner O'Connor: So that would come over the front porch? <br />Lee: Yes, they would go over the front porch. To address the private open space, they <br />will get as much private open space on the ground floor as well as the second level. <br />Chair Ritter: I think I'm okay with the setbacks with the openness of them. It's not like it's <br />a big wall coming out. <br />Lee: Right. If you want to add more character to the street, maybe we could put a little <br />picket fence or some kind of low wall in the front to define the public space on the St. <br />John sidewalk; maybe set it back two feet and have a little private yard fence or <br />possible gate before getting to your front porch. It kind of creates a small town feel that <br />Downtown Pleasanton is, so we could be adding more features to the front yard and <br />front yard landscaping to create that quaintness and charm for these buildings. <br />Chair Ritter: I'm not in favor of those little fences. It's too tight. You can put them on a <br />bigger area. <br />Commissioner O'Connor: If you have only eight feet to the front porch and you want to <br />set it back two feet, you only have six feet just to give a picket look. <br />Lee: Or you can do a hedge without the fence. That kind of creates the same buffer <br />zone of private /public space. <br />Commissioner Allen: So my initial impression on this is if these were individual stand- <br />alone row houses, more like Kimberly Commons, small new homes, then this kind of <br />setback feels okay to me. With a triplex, it feels more massive to me, and therefore, I'm <br />feeling like I want a setback that is greater. <br />Chair Ritter: I would look at it the other way. I think because they have an open porch, it <br />feels like it's not right at the curb. <br />Commissioner O'Connor: So the difference is that at the ground floor, the porch sets <br />back and you step right onto the staircase going up. <br />Commissioner Allen: Now are you talking about the Kimberly Commons? <br />Chair Ritter: No the other one. <br />Commissioner Allen: No, I'm not talking about the other one. The other one's not a good <br />example to me. That is overwhelming. I'm talking about the Kimberly Commons which <br />are small little cottage stand -alone units right around the corner. <br />Amos: The one on the corner is actually closer; the duplex, that's on the corner of <br />Peters and St. John. That definitely has a closer setback on that side, but the rest is <br />more comparable to this proposal here with further setbacks. <br />Chair Ritter: That actually feels high <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, March 23, 2016 Page 38 of 46 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.