Laserfiche WebLink
make is I don't agree with your underlying premise that we ought to be absolutely <br />beholden to the 40 %. <br />Commissioner Allen: Thank you for sharing that <br />Commissioner O'Connor: I also agree. I don't think Nancy was asking to do an <br />averaging. <br />Commissioner Nagler: No, I know. I appreciate that. I'm just commenting. <br />Commissioner O'Connor: I do think though, and I have to thank Jeff for making that <br />option, that by removing some of the bonus rooms, it opens up the sky a bit. It makes it <br />a little less massive through the neighborhood and he said they could live with five of <br />the nine homes having bonus rooms and I think that would be a great compromise. <br />Commissioner Nagler: Yes, I could support that. <br />Commissioner Allen: And I would too. <br />Commissioner O'Connor: So I'll make the motion that we forward Case PUD -99 to the <br />City Council with a recommendation for approval by making the three findings in the <br />staff report and with the modification that only five of the nine homes currently shown <br />with the bonus room are constructed with the bonus room. <br />Commissioner Allen: Did you want to add something on height? <br />Commissioner O'Connor: No, I think the height is okay. The neighborhood right next <br />door is at 32 feet and it does give them a little bit of wiggle room and if engineering turns <br />out to be a little off by 6" or 12 ", because the neighborhood is at 32 feet, I think it's okay <br />at 32 feet. <br />Chair Ritter: Do we have a second? <br />Commissioner Nagler: Second. <br />Chair Ritter: Any discussion? <br />Beaudin: Chair? Could we just make sure we add /amend the conditions based on the <br />memo that was submitted this evening with that motion? Jenny mentioned it in her <br />presentation. <br />Commissioner O'Connor: Yes. <br />Ritter: Per the memo dated March 23rd, staff is recommending the following new <br />conditions of approval be added: "The plot plans and house model and elevation type <br />for Lots 1 -5 shall adhere to the "Lots 1 -5 Preliminary Plotting Exhibit," dated "Received, <br />March 21, 2016," on file with the Planning Division." Are we all in agreement? <br />All Commissioners: Yes. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, March 23, 2016 Page 24 of 46 <br />