PC 032316 - Laserfiche WebLink

Commissioner Nagler: Could I just ask a question about that? On this replotting average 40% FAR, what's the maximum FAR? Schroeder: We still have a couple of 45 %'s, but nothing goes over 45% in the whole thing. Isn't that right? They're all in that table. Hardy: 3 are at .45. Chair Ritter: So the FAR went up in support of trying to help the neighbors. Schroeder: It just ended up that way because we were trying to have really nice houses that fit in and you know, I think it's going to be a real benefit to the neighborhood and it's the minimum lots we could get on there and make the thing work. The driving range thing has driven a lot of it. The driving range issue was the biggest issue here and it's taken us quite a while to work closely with the fairgrounds and with the neighbors. They've been really helpful and Greg's here tonight I think still, to get to this point, and so we think we've satisfied the neighbor's concern with plotting and whatnot that we've done and so if you guys are comfortable with the average, we can get there. Beaudin: Jeff, here's the logistic issue, I mean, 10 years from now, we're all gone and somebody says I want to do an addition on my home and you say you're fine limiting it but it's one of those anomalies that will only exist in your PUD. Schroeder: Well, that's done in other neighborhoods like our smaller lot project. I think we have that restriction at Stanley. Beaudin: No additions? Schroeder: Yes. there's no setback room in some of those lots. Beaudin: But there will be in these ones and that's going to be the issue. People are going to buy that and it's just not going to be obvious to people on the front end. Schroeder: It will be in the CC &Rs. Beaudin: Can I propose another way to get to where we're trying to get? If we had a maximum FAR — there's a table. I don't know if everyone's looking at the table or not, but it's sheet 2 of 4 and it's the RJA documents towards the end of your plan. It's 2 of 4 in the staff drawings. Commissioner Allen: Can you show us what you're looking at? Seto: It's in this one. If you turn to the second page, it's right at Table 1. Beaudin: So there's a table and it's not the easiest table to read, but there's Plan 2 FARs and Plan 2 FARs with bonus as some of the column titles. They show the FARs and there's certain lot, the lots are identified. What I'd like to do if there's a willingness to pursue the average, then what I would say is, let's allow for the up to 45% or up to 42% or however we want to limit them and go lot by lot and just set the number based on the PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, March 23, 2016 Page 19 of 46