My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 030916
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2016
>
PC 030916
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2017 2:28:45 PM
Creation date
8/11/2017 2:21:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
3/9/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City won't have to pay for it. It will be paid for by private property owners. We do not <br />want to say this is a sidewalk to nowhere because it does connect to the sidewalk in the <br />Preserve. There's a sidewalk along Laurel Creek and the utility of that sidewalk is <br />probably pretty limited so again we're looking at long -term pedestrian access in this <br />area. <br />O'Connor: Who would maintain this walkway after the development is completed? The <br />sidewalk in front of your house is maintained now by the homeowner. Would the same <br />thing be with the decomposed granite path? Or, would it all be maintained by the <br />property owners and not by the City? <br />Weinstein: That's right <br />Ritter: I have one more speaker card. I apologize. I have one speaker card and then <br />we'll bring it back to questions. Diane Kolb? Is Diane here? <br />Diane Kolb: Hi, I'm Diane Lester Kolb, neighbor. I'm for this project, but I'm interested in <br />the open space, the issue about the animals. I've known Barbara and her family for 55 <br />years. You brought that up. I'm very interested in that. If it was sidewalk and cement, <br />the City of Pleasanton would maintain it? Right? The property owner would maintain <br />it? Okay. They want to put in three houses in, so the three houses would be charged <br />yearly for that kind of situation to upkeep that? Or, how would it be if it's a walkway that <br />you're going to extend, extend, extend. How does that work financially for the land <br />owners or the property owners of that area? My main concern is what the cost would <br />be because we plan on coming to you people with a project ourselves, so I'm interested <br />in that kind of situation versus the cement sidewalk, but I really like this project. Thank <br />you. <br />Ritter: Thank you, we'll bring it back to staff and the Commission. <br />Harryman: I'll just back up what Adam was saying. So people don't necessarily realize it <br />but state law requires the adjacent property owner, whether it's residential or <br />commercial, to maintain the sidewalk adjacent to their property. The same thing would <br />be the case whether this is a concrete sidewalk or whether it's some sort of path. <br />O'Connor: And the maintenance is as needed. So if tree roots are lifting it up or other <br />trip hazards, or if the path is worn down by horses running down it or whatever.... <br />Harryman: That's exactly right. State law actually talks about keeping it maintained so it <br />is safe for users. So that's the standard — basically no tripping hazards, no divots, <br />anything that would create a safety hazard to a pedestrian or possibly a bicyclist. <br />O'Connor: And it doesn't matter what it's made of? <br />Harryman: No. <br />Allen: I was comparing the square footage of Lot 3 from the plan 10 years ago versus <br />now and it looks like it's about 20% larger in terms of square footage. The house was <br />4,100 square feet, Lot 3, plus a 700 - square -foot garage, so roughly in counting the two <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, March 9, 2016 Page 7 of 25 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.