Laserfiche WebLink
City won't have to pay for it. It will be paid for by private property owners. We do not <br />want to say this is a sidewalk to nowhere because it does connect to the sidewalk in the <br />Preserve. There's a sidewalk along Laurel Creek and the utility of that sidewalk is <br />probably pretty limited so again we're looking at long -term pedestrian access in this <br />area. <br />O'Connor: Who would maintain this walkway after the development is completed? The <br />sidewalk in front of your house is maintained now by the homeowner. Would the same <br />thing be with the decomposed granite path? Or, would it all be maintained by the <br />property owners and not by the City? <br />Weinstein: That's right <br />Ritter: I have one more speaker card. I apologize. I have one speaker card and then <br />we'll bring it back to questions. Diane Kolb? Is Diane here? <br />Diane Kolb: Hi, I'm Diane Lester Kolb, neighbor. I'm for this project, but I'm interested in <br />the open space, the issue about the animals. I've known Barbara and her family for 55 <br />years. You brought that up. I'm very interested in that. If it was sidewalk and cement, <br />the City of Pleasanton would maintain it? Right? The property owner would maintain <br />it? Okay. They want to put in three houses in, so the three houses would be charged <br />yearly for that kind of situation to upkeep that? Or, how would it be if it's a walkway that <br />you're going to extend, extend, extend. How does that work financially for the land <br />owners or the property owners of that area? My main concern is what the cost would <br />be because we plan on coming to you people with a project ourselves, so I'm interested <br />in that kind of situation versus the cement sidewalk, but I really like this project. Thank <br />you. <br />Ritter: Thank you, we'll bring it back to staff and the Commission. <br />Harryman: I'll just back up what Adam was saying. So people don't necessarily realize it <br />but state law requires the adjacent property owner, whether it's residential or <br />commercial, to maintain the sidewalk adjacent to their property. The same thing would <br />be the case whether this is a concrete sidewalk or whether it's some sort of path. <br />O'Connor: And the maintenance is as needed. So if tree roots are lifting it up or other <br />trip hazards, or if the path is worn down by horses running down it or whatever.... <br />Harryman: That's exactly right. State law actually talks about keeping it maintained so it <br />is safe for users. So that's the standard — basically no tripping hazards, no divots, <br />anything that would create a safety hazard to a pedestrian or possibly a bicyclist. <br />O'Connor: And it doesn't matter what it's made of? <br />Harryman: No. <br />Allen: I was comparing the square footage of Lot 3 from the plan 10 years ago versus <br />now and it looks like it's about 20% larger in terms of square footage. The house was <br />4,100 square feet, Lot 3, plus a 700 - square -foot garage, so roughly in counting the two <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, March 9, 2016 Page 7 of 25 <br />