PC 011316 - Laserfiche WebLink

project. The loss of public parking for my employees and other employees and customers of businesses in the area is a minor point and one that I could easily mitigate for my people. I'm actually in favor of widening Johnson Drive to accommodate alternate retail solutions that will likely occupy this prime space. The reason I'm opposing Costco here is because of the eagerly anticipated potential tax revenue increase associated with a big box addition is blatantly outweighed by unacceptable traffic congestion which cannot be mitigated properly according to the EIR, additional pollution, extreme cost to the road building infrastructure and the negative impacts on local small businesses. Traffic is my biggest concern. Yes, it will be costly to my business. More than this, it will adversely affect all community members by significantly increasing travel delays on all roads surrounding this area including Hopyard, Stoneridge, Owens, ultimately 1 -580 and 1 -680. Despite all of these drawbacks, the program continues to move forward to the benefit of the land owner, Nearon, and the City without the approval of people of Pleasanton. Public safety, quality of life and the stability of our local businesses are all being disregarded in the hope for more tax revenue and minor convenience for Costco club members, many of which will come from outside of Pleasanton. I promote the responsible growth of commerce in this City. I'd like to propose a mixed use retail in the EDZ, limiting building size to 50,000 square feet with small to medium sized businesses. This could be local businesses who have contributed to Pleasanton over the years a much needed boost and additional visibility in a high traffic area. I use Costco; I think it's a great company. This just isn't the right place for one. If a Costco is approved here, it will speak loudly to the future direction of Pleasanton. Outside the undoubtable issues it will cause, it will also put a welcome mat for more big box retail in our City. At what point will enough be enough? I urge you to re- examine the General Plan and the EIR while considering what is best for the general public and present your findings and determinations in an effective manner that welcomes equitable input from our residents. Thank you. Chair Ritter requested Mr. Weinstein provide an update on the matter. Weinstein: The comment period on the Draft Supplemental EIR (DSEIR) ended in November and so we've spent time since then compiling the large number of comments we got from the public and from government agencies and are organizing them and responding to them. So we're in the middle of the Response to Comments process right now. As part of that Response to Comments process, we will be responding to all of the individual comments that we've received. We'll also be undertaking and we are undertaking enhanced additional technical studies on the project, including additional air quality work, additional traffic work and an expanded economic study that will look at impacts to small businesses among other things, and we're anticipating that the Response to Comments document and FEIR will be published in the next couple of months. Then following that we'll have a joint City Council /Planning Commission meeting where the City Council and you can sit down together to talk about the project with the information in the FEIR in front of you. Then after that there would be Planning Commission and City Council meetings on the project, all of which will have opportunities for public input. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, January 13, 2016 Page 3 of 26