My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 082615
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2015
>
PC 082615
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 4:54:00 PM
Creation date
8/10/2017 4:44:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
8/26/2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
could actually be built, and if everything needs to be tucked to the back or however it is <br />configured, that would be great. He added that if they only end up with only three units <br />and they need four units for it to pencil out, then the Commission should be cognizant of <br />that. <br />G. Does the Planning Commission support granting a parking credit? <br />Commissioner O'Connor stated that the Commission went down this the last time and <br />stated that it would not do that anymore. <br />Chair Allen agreed and recalled that the Commission said it has to be really protective <br />of that. <br />Commissioner O'Connor stated that what is being done here is taking a very small <br />building that has a very large parking lot and completely building out the parking lot and <br />leaving no room for parking. He said that he is not in favor of this and that parking that <br />is required for the retail building should be provided. <br />Commissioners Ritter, Piper, Nagler, and Chair Allen all agreed. <br />Commissioner Nagler recalled that there is a possibility that they come back with a very <br />concrete plan as was suggested to create parking that is accessible. <br />H_ Does the Planning Commission support the in -lieu proposal for the <br />commercial /office building? <br />Chair Allen stated that this is the concept of credit for the proposal. She indicated that <br />the Commission wants appropriate parking for the site. <br />1. Does the Planning Commission support the use of the 20 -foot deep driveway <br />approaches as parking for the townhouses? <br />Chair Allen stated that she understands the normal rules for apartments also generally <br />apply to townhouses. She inquired if that is for parking or for guest parking. <br />Mr. Luchini replied that it is for guest parking. <br />Chair Allen inquired if the new rule is one guest parking spot per seven units or seven <br />bedrooms. <br />Commissioner O'Connor replied that it is for seven units. <br />Chair Allen commented that rounding -up, it would require one guest parking spot. <br />Mr. Weinstein stated that what staff is asking for is the Commission's level of comfort on <br />dimensions of the guest parking in the context of a sedan being approximately 14 feet <br />long and a big SUV being 18 feet long or so. He indicated that the issue here is that the <br />driveways are a little bit on the tight side, but staff thinks it can work because it is a <br />Downtown site, and cars and even SUVs can actually fit in these driveways. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, August 26, 2015 Page 39 of 43 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.