Laserfiche WebLink
3. MEETING OPEN FOR ANY MEMBER OF THE AUDIENCE TO ADDRESS THE <br />PLANNING COMMISSION ON ANY ITEM WHICH IS NOT ALREADY ON THE <br />AGENDA <br />There were no members of the audience wishing to address the Commission. <br />4. REVISIONS TO THE AGENDA <br />Adam Weinstein advised that there were no revisions to the Agenda. <br />5. CONSENT CALENDAR <br />Consent Calendar items are considered routine and will be enacted, approved, or <br />adopted by one motion unless a request for removal for discussion or <br />explanation is received from the Planning Commission or a member of the public <br />by submitting a speaker card for that item. <br />There were no items for consideration under the Consent Calendar. <br />6. PUBLIC HEARING AND OTHER MATTERS <br />a. PUD -25, Greenbriar Homes Communities, Lund Ranch II <br />Applications for (1) Planned Unit Development (PUD) Rezoning and <br />Development Plan approval to construct 50 single - family, two -story <br />homes and related improvements on the approximately 194.7 -acre Lund <br />Ranch II property located at 1500 Lund Ranch Road at the end of Lund <br />Ranch Road; (2) Certification of the Final Environmental Impact Report <br />(EIR) prepared for the project; and (3) Development Agreement to vest <br />entitlements for the project. Zoning for the property is PUD- LDR /OS <br />(Planned Unit Development — Low Density Residential /Open Space) <br />District. <br />Commissioner O'Connor recused himself due to a conflict of interest. <br />Brian Dolan presented the staff report, noting that this is a continued hearing from the <br />June 24, 2015 Planning Commission meeting, where the four Commissioners present <br />were unable to pass a motion, and the Commissioner's Handbook provides that when <br />motion results in a tie vote, the item would be re -heard at a future meeting with a full <br />Commission in attendance. <br />Mr. Dolan stated that he would not be going through the long, comprehensive <br />presentation made at the last meeting but would only be covering some new information <br />specifically requested by the Commission at and since that meeting. He indicated that <br />his presentation tonight would primarily be related to the impacts of potentially building a <br />second access road up the hill to connect to Sunset Creek Lane, followed by a <br />reiteration of staff's recommendation and the reason behind such recommendation, and <br />ending with a few housekeeping items. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, August 26, 2015 Page 2 of 43 <br />