My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 081215
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2015
>
PC 081215
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 4:52:26 PM
Creation date
8/10/2017 4:43:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
8/12/2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
With respect to the parking adequacy, Ms. Hardy stated that as mentioned earlier, <br />parking demand is very strong on behalf of the operator. She pointed out that the <br />Municipal Code requires one parking space per administrator or employee, which she <br />felt is being provided above and beyond in supplemental parking. <br />Commissioner Ritter thanked Ponderosa for doing an amazing job in Pleasanton. He <br />asked Ms. Hardy if they are trying to work around the two existing preschool buildings <br />and the future one to make 27 units fit. He stated that he knows there was the same <br />issue with the Stanley project, but asked if it would be feasible for Ponderosa to <br />redevelop the whole area to make the flow a lot easier and not have to worry about <br />existing structures; for example, having the preschool in a different corner of the lot. <br />Ms. Hardy replied that having the buildings in a different location would obviously mean <br />having a different set of opportunities and constraints. She indicated, however, that <br />they are dealing with what they have and cannot ignore the preschool and their parking <br />and circulation requirements when they start doing their site constraints and <br />opportunities. She added that she does not want to give the impression that they just <br />looked at what was left and crammed them in there. She reiterated that this is not a <br />typical site plan; it is a functional one that may not be what the Planning Commission <br />sees all the time. She stated that she does not really see a flaw in this, and everything <br />to the west of the day care center is about as typical as it gets from a site plan <br />perspective. She noted that the only different thing is the six lots off of their own street <br />in its own little niche with plenty of landscape buffers and setbacks around the houses <br />that could really make those a desirable place in which to live. She pointed out that <br />they sell houses and obviously have to look at what makes sense for them from a <br />business standpoint. She added that since they filed the application at the end of last <br />year, they have eliminated three lots as a result of staff recommendations, and they are <br />now at a point where they cannot absorb any more costs. <br />Commissioner O'Connor inquired how many units the newest senior complex next door <br />has and if the sidewalks are adjoined to the street or have a separation. <br />Ms. Hardy replied that The Villages have 110 units, most of which have an attached <br />sidewalk with some elements of detached sidewalks closer to the clubhouse. <br />Commissioner O'Connor inquired if some of the units have no sidewalks. <br />Ms. Hardy replied that she was not certain but that she thinks those at the end of the <br />cul -de -sac have no sidewalks. She noted, however, that this is an active adult situation <br />where they wanted to promote people to walk and interact with one another, and it has <br />worked out very well. <br />Commissioner Nagler referred to the Ivy Lane homes and noted that there were no <br />yards around most of the homes. He stated that he can understand the conversations <br />of this Commission regarding this project, which was before he joined the Commission, <br />would be similar to the conversation the Commission is having this evening because the <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, August 12, 2015 Page 8 of 34 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.