PC 081215 - Laserfiche WebLink

Exhibit A -1 of the staff report, with a modification to Condition No. 49 to retain the gate at the trail connection, and to eliminate Condition No. 60 regarding the construction of a bus shelter, and the amendments to the motion regarding the enhanced amenity, the unit reduction, and the parking agreement, as previously discussed by the Commission; and (5) recommend approval of the proposed modifications to the existing Centerpointe Presbyterian Church site plan (P15 -0390) and the Conditional Use Permit (1315 -0250) to eliminate the existing church its related uses and retain the existing preschool /private school facility as a stand -alone use with a modified operation and site plan, subject to the Conditions of Approval in Exhibit A -2. Commissioner Piper seconded the motion. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Commissioners O'Connor, Piper, and Ritter NOES: None ABSTAIN: Commissioners Allen and Nagler RECUSED: None ABSENT: Commissioner Balch Resolutions Nos. PC- 2015 -21 recommending approval of the Negative Declaration; PC- 2015 -22 recommending approval of Case P15 -0250 (General Plan Amendment); PC- 2015 -23 recommending approval of Cases P15 -0249 and PUD -111 (Rezoning and Development Plan); PC- 2015 -24 recommending approval of Case P15 -0390 (modifications to the Centerpointe Presbyterian Church approved site plan); and PC- 2015 -25 recommending approval of Case P15 -0250 (Conditional Use Permit), were entered and adopted as motioned. Commissioner Piper asked Chair Allen to reiterate what her abstention vote was as she did not understand it. Chair Allen stated that she is abstaining because she really would like to see this worked through completely and come back to the Commission for approval before it goes to the Council because she also feels like the end proposal to the Council may not represent as strongly as she think it should what has been said here. She added that she is also disappointed that Ponderosa did not take the time to do a Work Session because she thinks that is important to the community and important for developing the right projects. She noted that she felt, in reading the staff report, that there did not appear to be as much give- and -take as she has seen with other developers and that she would hope for future projects that could be controversial where there are design discussions like tonight, that Ponderosa would take the time to do Work Sessions and work more collaboratively with staff upfront. Ms. Hardy stated that at the risk of there being a dialogue, she is really disappointed to hear any Commissioners have that viewpoint because the fact is, they have been working on this project for over a year and thought that they worked through a lot of the PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, August 12, 2015 Page 32 of 34