My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 062415
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2015
>
PC 062415
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 4:49:59 PM
Creation date
8/10/2017 4:39:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
6/24/2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mr. Dolan then displayed the site development plan and pointed out the valley or bowl in <br />the middle of the site, which is the area where all the development is proposed, off of <br />Lund Ranch Road with a series of three different cul -de -sacs that extend off of the new <br />extension of Lund Ranch Road. He described the project development plan consisting <br />of 50 units, 48 of which are production homes and two custom homes on two very large <br />estate lots. He noted that the developed portion of the site would be 33.8 acres, and <br />160.9 acres would be preserved as permanent open space dedicated to the City; there <br />is one connection to Lund Ranch Road with no other proposed street connections to <br />Middleton Place, to Sunset Creek Lane, or to the Foley property. He indicated that <br />there are three different building plans that range in square footage from 4,100 square <br />feet to about 4,500 square feet, one and two stories in height with four and five <br />bedrooms. <br />PROJECT ISSUES <br />Road Access <br />Mr. Dolan stated that this is the biggest issue related to the project and has been the <br />subject of the most controversy. He indicated that the developer proposed access only <br />through Lund Ranch Road, and a lot of the discussion related to whether or not that <br />would be the only access. He noted, however, that the Environmental Impact Report <br />(EIR) did analyze a total of eight alternatives, which was narrowed down at the Work <br />Session to three alternatives, which seem to be scenarios which frame the range of <br />realistic possibilities for access: <br />Scenario 1. This is the proposed project. The EIR identified that the trip generation from <br />the project would be 550 trips. In this scenario, all the trips would all go out Lund Ranch <br />Road and split out to Independence Road. All of the project traffic would go on Ventana <br />Hills. <br />Scenario 3. This scenario has a double connection, and the 550 trips would be split <br />between Lund Ranch Road and Sunset Creek Lane. The numbers are estimates based <br />on staff's observation from other people in the area and which way they head from this <br />area when going to work or other places. The choices made by the people who move in <br />obviously might be different from these assumptions. <br />Scenario 6. This basically identified the Bonde Ranch agreement which was created as <br />a part of the Bonde Ranch approval process. It basically promised the Ventana Hills <br />neighborhood that there would be no connection to Lund Ranch Road, and everything <br />on the Lund Ranch II property would ultimately be connected to either Sunset Creek <br />Lane or Sycamore Creek Way. In addition, the traffic from Middleton Place, which <br />currently goes out through Ventana Hills, would be re- routed on roads that have already <br />been constructed but connect to project roads in Lund Ranch II; and that would be sent <br />out the other way as well. So all 550 trips, plus 140 trips from Middleton Place, would <br />end up on Sunset Creek Lane, and then they would have some choices off of Sunset <br />Creek Lane or down to Sycamore Creek Way. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, June 24, 2015 Page 4 of 54 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.