My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 062415
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2015
>
PC 062415
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 4:49:59 PM
Creation date
8/10/2017 4:39:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
6/24/2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
that size might have been able to pay for the road. He added that with the adoption of <br />Measure PP, that project is going to shrink considerably, like Lund Ranch II did, to the <br />point where it is not going to be anywhere near that and at a certain point it just cannot <br />pay for the Bypass Road. He indicated that it would cost millions of dollars to do it, and <br />there is not enough development out there to make it happen. <br />Commissioner Nagler stated that as he is hearing Mr. Dolan, there are other factors that <br />are more important to whether the road gets built than whether or not a precedent <br />happens. <br />Mr. Dolan replied that he would not say they are important, but they probably have more <br />influence on whether or not it happens. <br />Commissioner Nagler asked if his understanding is correct that the Option 3 <br />recommendation of having 10 homes basically go in one direction and 40 go in another <br />is because 10 is the number that is exempt from Measure PP. <br />Mr. Dolan said yes; that is the base or starting point for the conversation, and it seemed <br />reasonable. <br />Commissioner Nagler noted that if a policy decision were made by the Council or the <br />developer to divide the project and create two entrances, it could be a different number <br />than 10. <br />Mr. Dolan confirmed that it could. <br />Commissioner Piper stated that this obviously is such a difficult topic and certainly one <br />of the most difficult since she has been on the Planning Commission. She thanked the <br />applicants for their patience and their contribution to the City, and acknowledged that <br />Greenbriar Homes does build beautiful products. She indicated that there are two <br />things she wants to talk about: <br />A huge portion of this is definitely emotional. From purely a standpoint of <br />emotion and not taking into consideration Measure PP or the environmental <br />impacts or the intent of the voters and the drafters of Measure PP and all of that, <br />she would conclude that the access should be on the side of Sycamore Creek <br />Way. That neighborhood knew that this was coming; there was a road there, <br />there was signage there, it shows in the CC &Rs, and it was disclosed by the <br />builders. These neighbors moved into that neighborhood knowing full well that at <br />some point there would be access to another neighborhood. It is sad that both <br />neighborhoods could potentially be burdened by traffic, particularly the Junipero <br />Street side in that neighborhood because they continue to take the burden of <br />more and more traffic, and that is not right. <br />Commissioner Piper indicated that she has been a Pleasanton resident for <br />40 years and knows that neighborhood well; she knows what has gone on in <br />these last few years, particularly with commute patterns and the people who are <br />driving from Pleasanton to the South Bay through Independence Drive to try to <br />get through some of that traffic on Sunol Boulevard. Ms. LaBarge's comment <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, June 24, 2015 Page 34 of 54 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.