Laserfiche WebLink
Commissioner Piper inquired if the exact number of homes proposed for this project at <br />the time the Ventana Hills agreement was written was 150 or 196. <br />Mr. Dolan replied that he believes it was 150 but that he would want to research that to <br />confirm. <br />Commissioner Balch commented that he believes the first plan was for 113. <br />Chair Allen asked the applicant if he had an answer to that question. <br />Mr. Meyers replied that Shea Homes had proposed 150 homes at the time the Bonde <br />Ranch project was approved. <br />Referring to Mr. Dolan's statement that, in fact, people can cite different sections of the <br />City Code to make a point, Commissioner Nagler stated that he thinks it would be fair to <br />say that most of the comments this evening and certainly in written correspondence <br />received try and make this argument whether the City Code states that a road is or is <br />not a structure. He noted that the Municipal Code Section 18.08.535 provided by staff <br />actually ends with the phrase "but not including a fence or a wall used as a fence if the <br />height does not exceed six feet, or access drives or walks." He further noted that it is <br />possible to interpret that an access road is a piece of cement that is constructed and put <br />on the ground and somehow has some engineering tending to it, and therefore, <br />according to this section, a road is actually exempt from the definition of a structure. He <br />asked if that was true. <br />Mr. Dolan replied that that is possible. He noted that that was a line of dialogue that the <br />Commission had a couple of years ago and that some of the Commissioners were <br />considering. <br />Commissioner Nagler stated that he understands that a lot of this conversation about <br />the interpretation of Measure PP is, for some people, potentially precedential for <br />decisions that may be looming on other projects or other elements of the General Plan <br />or site specific plan. He noted that in his conversations with people on the issue, the <br />Callippe Bypass Road comes up as an item of some interest and even controversy and <br />that a decision ultimately to connect into the Sycamore neighborhood might somehow <br />be creating a precedent on the Callippe Bypass Road. He inquired if the need for that <br />Callippe Bypass Road continues to exist, and if that road will still be built at some point <br />in the future or if the need has somehow become less over time. <br />Mr. Dolan noted that that is a very good question and not that easy to answer. He <br />stated that if it were based on pure traffic analysis, how many trips and how many <br />intersections operate, the current system, without the Bypass Road, collects the traffic <br />and does its job without violating any of the City's Level of Standard. He noted, <br />however, that as part of the discussion about the golf course and the surrounding <br />neighborhood, the City agreed to have this completed and put it into the plans. He <br />indicated that more important at this point than whether it is necessary or not is the <br />question of whether it will ever be built. He explained that it comes down to a significant <br />funding problem, as it was considered at a time when the Spotorno property also had a <br />specific plan designation for a lot of units, pushing about 200 in total, and a project of <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, June 24, 2015 Page 33 of 54 <br />