My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 062415
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2015
>
PC 062415
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 4:49:59 PM
Creation date
8/10/2017 4:39:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
6/24/2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
20 years, Planning has supported routing the road connections for the Lund Ranch <br />project through Bridle Creek and Sycamore Heights, and he does not believe there is <br />any justification to dismiss more than two decades of thoughtful and collaborative <br />planning between the City and the community. She added that the CC &R's for both of <br />these neighborhoods note the future development possibility to the east, including <br />specifically the Lund Ranch II property and the road connections to that development. <br />She noted that the CC &R's are a public record that are part of the closing documents <br />homeowners must sign -off on prior to purchasing their home. <br />Ms. Spain stated that Option 1, which proposes putting the entire increase in traffic from <br />the Lund Ranch 11 development through Ventana Hills and Mission Park neighborhoods, <br />is not fair or reasonable. She indicated that she does not want to see any neighborhood <br />burdened with traffic, and she does not believe that building in the community can be <br />stopped. She stated that the road connection from Lund Ranch II to Sunset Creek Lane <br />is no different from many roads already established in Pleasanton: it will not stand out, <br />it will not be on a ridge, and it can be developed into the natural topography in a way <br />that is consistent with other roads in the City. She added that it would be unfair to <br />overburden any single neighborhood with already existing high traffic volumes, <br />specifically their Mission Park neighbors on Junipero Street. She noted that putting the <br />majority of the Lund Ranch II development traffic through the Bridle Creek and <br />Sycamore Heights neighborhood is the right decision, especially given the numerous <br />agreements and plans that are part of the public record. <br />Ms. Spain stated that some will argue tonight that the road through Bridle Creek and <br />Sycamore Heights should not be built because of Measure PP, and that the people of <br />Pleasanton who voted for Measure PP do not support this road. She noted that this is <br />not necessarily true because she is one of the many people who voted for Measure PP, <br />and she does, in fact, support this new connector road. She added that she would <br />argue that Measure PP was not intended to include roads, and her position is confirmed <br />and documented in City records when the proponents of Measure PP addressed the <br />issue of roads on several occasions prior to the passing of Measure PP in November. <br />Ms. Spain stated that the City's goal has always been to keep the flow of traffic <br />reasonable for all neighborhoods. She indicated that although Option 2 is in line with <br />previous agreements and understandings and would be their preference, she agrees <br />with staff that Option 3 best balances the previous commitments made by the City, the <br />plans previously adopted by the City, and the concerns of affected neighborhoods. She <br />stated that Option 3 is an acceptable compromise, provided the cul -de -sac at the end of <br />Lund Ranch Road contains ten homes or preferably less. She concluded by saying that <br />she would like to have the construction traffic recommendations previously noted by Bill <br />Spain be added to the developer's agreements and conditions of approval. <br />Shareef Mandavi, a Pleasanton resident for 22 years, stated that he has been listening <br />to the commentary from the neighbors in Ventana Hills and that he has known people <br />who live there and have moved there partly because they were told that there is an <br />agreement with the City that no traffic will be coming through this neighborhood. He <br />noted, however, that over the past few months, it has been mentioned in hearings that <br />such an agreement never existed. He agreed that there might have been numerous <br />discussions about it, but that was an agreement with a builder and not with the City, and <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, June 24, 2015 Page 22 of 54 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.