Laserfiche WebLink
Metadata
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015 Laserfiche. All rights reserved.
Mr. Tassano replied that the Scenario 3 traffic did not go into that level of detail. He <br />indicated that what Chair Allen is recalling is his added input, which was not actually in <br />the report. He clarified that staff put exactly what was in the report but that his item of <br />concern was that it could potentially be different than this distribution or greater, <br />depending on what sort of cut - through routes were desirable from the residents who live <br />there. <br />Commissioner Balch inquired where the 550 trips were in Scenario 3 or if that number <br />had changed. <br />Mr. Tassano replied that 500 trips is a standard one that staff would normally use just <br />because it is an easy number to use: 50 homes /500 trips. He explained that the <br />Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) actually produces that number, but it also has an <br />equation which more closely resembles the line of actual trip distribution. He stated that <br />he did not like to use that just because the difference between 10 and 11 trips is minor, <br />and when it goes down to 10.2 trips, the numbers change with so many scenarios like <br />this, and it becomes a little more difficult to explain. He clarified that the number is <br />normally 500 trips, and this report has 550 trips. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, June 24, 2015 Page 11 of 54 <br />