My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 051315
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2015
>
PC 051315
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 4:47:25 PM
Creation date
8/10/2017 4:35:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
5/13/2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
understanding that the idea of giving a credit for the building that was previously there is <br />based on the assumption that the Downtown created those 12 parking spaces <br />previously, and therefore, it would be unfair for the new developer to have to recreate <br />those same 12 spaces. <br />Mr. Weinstein replied that the intent of the policy here is really just to promote the <br />redevelopment of Downtown with high quality buildings and to give developers an <br />incentive to replace older buildings with a higher degree of architectural and pedestrian <br />interest. <br />Commissioner Nagler inquired what the basis is for the ratio of one parking space per <br />300 square feet. <br />Mr. Weinstein stated that parking is an art and not a science; it is about making sure <br />there is sufficient parking but not too much parking at the same time. He explained that <br />one space per 300 square feet is a generic parking ratio that is embedded in the City's <br />Municipal Code and imposed on projects. He indicated that this ratio has been used <br />over the years and allows for sufficient parking in the Downtown without having too <br />much of it. He noted that Commissioner Nagler had a good point that this ratio would <br />probably not provide enough parking for certain retail spaces or restaurants. He noted, <br />however, that because it might also be too much parking for other uses, this ratio is an <br />average that is reasonable for this sort of use. He added that the Code was modified <br />15 years ago to relax the parking requirements for restaurant uses to match those of <br />retail and to try and incentivize restaurants Downtown. <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. <br />Robert Dondero, Applicant, stated that he and his brother own the property at 725 Main <br />Street that has been referred to by many names including the hole on Main Street, the <br />Union Jack's Pub, and the Ugly Green Fence. He indicated that he is a 25 -year <br />resident of Pleasanton and lives in the Downtown. He pointed out that for him, this <br />project is far beyond just a building; it is a project of passion and love on which he and <br />his brother have spent a lot of time to try and come up with something really nice and <br />appealing to everybody. He added that he really believes in this plan and that a good <br />plan will speak for itself. He then turned the floor over to the project architect. <br />Phil Volkmann, Project Architect, stated that he has been working with the Dondero <br />brothers on this project for the last 18 months. He indicated that when they began this <br />project, they had a vision in their mind of what kind of building they wanted: an inviting <br />place where the community could come down for entertainment on a weekend. He <br />noted that they first discussed building types and construction costs, and then got into <br />the idea of a building that a restaurant or restaurants would be interested in, a building <br />that undulated so it connected at the pedestrian level. <br />Mr. Volkmann stated that the City's zoning regulations are very flexible that allowed <br />them to have that balcony float out over the public way as long as it is 12 feet off of the <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, May 13, 2015 Page 4 of 32 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.