My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 022515
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2015
>
PC 022515
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 4:45:14 PM
Creation date
8/10/2017 4:27:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
2/25/2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
there is no concern that the on- coming vehicle is going to scrape the mirror. With respect <br />to traffic volumes, he stated that because Hanifen Way is a newer road, it was built with <br />more structural integrity than Junipero Street; however, once the sub -base and asphalt are <br />placed, the volume of traffic, whether it is 3,000 or 1,000, does not really change the <br />condition, with the exception that general wear and tear will go up with constantly driving <br />3,000 vehicles a day versus 1,000 vehicles a day, but not to the point where it becomes <br />structurally unsound. <br />Chair Allen inquired if the width in Sycamore Creek Way anticipated the Lund Ranch II <br />traffic. <br />Mr. Tassano replied that Sycamore Creek Way predates his time, but there was the vision <br />that it was the proposed connection to the future development at the golf course before it <br />was actually a golf course. He pointed out that it is wider, with a bicycle lane and parking <br />only on one side, and it appears that road was meant to carry more of the traffic. He noted <br />that he has also received calls from Sycamore Creek Way residents for traffic - calming, just <br />as he has for Junipero Street. <br />Commissioner Ritter stated that he was looking through the cut -in's and noted that to get to <br />Sunol Boulevard, through Middleton Place would pass two stop signs and four turn signals; <br />through Lund Ranch Road would pass two stop signs and two turns without traffic signals; <br />through Sunset Creek Lane would pass zero stop signs and two turn signals; and through <br />Sycamore Creek Way would pass zero stop signs and zero turn signals. He pointed out <br />that based on the number of turns and considering safety and intersections where the <br />driver has to make a decision, Sycamore Creek Way seems like the best avenue to get out <br />of Lund Ranch II; the next one would be Sunset Creek Way; then Lund Ranch Road, and <br />finally Middleton Place. He then stated that in terms of access alternatives, he lives in a <br />neighborhood of 200 homes with one exit, and he does not run into his neighbor coming <br />out at the same time very often; and 50 homes is a lot less than 200 homes. He indicated <br />that he honestly does not think traffic is going to be a huge issue on clogging the roads <br />from the Lund Ranch development. <br />Mr. Dolan stated that there is one issue that was not discussed tonight and that no one <br />asked him about, and that is the connection to Sycamore Creek Way that Commissioner <br />Ritter referred to. He indicated that although it is evaluated in the EIR, he was not <br />convinced that is a realistic possibility. He pointed out that it is definitely wider than Sunset <br />Creek Lane, but it is also very hard to get up there because it is steeper and farther and <br />would require even more grading. He added that once there, the connection cannot be <br />made without going on the Spotorno property, which would mean involving another <br />property owner who is not connected with the project. He indicated that going around the <br />back side of the water tank would require quite a bit of land, and while going across the <br />front would require a smaller area, it would potentially interfere with the access to the water <br />tank. <br />Referring back to the matter of having two access points and cutting- through within the <br />development, Chair Allen suggested that it could be eliminated by creating a cul -de -sac, <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, February 25, 2015 Page 34 of 46 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.