My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 111214
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2014
>
PC 111214
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 4:24:07 PM
Creation date
8/10/2017 4:21:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
11/12/2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mr. Luchini said yes. <br />Commissioner Allen noted that a letter from one neighbor was received. She inquired <br />how many letters were received. <br />Mr. Luchini said one. <br />Chair O'Connor inquired if the one letter was from one of the ten homes. <br />Mr. Luchini replied that the person did not identify his address in his email but indicated <br />that he lives right across from YIA, which could be to the south across Junipero Street. <br />Commissioner Ritter inquired if the applicant would still want to stay in this location if the <br />Commission approved the Heritage School without the playground, or if the playground <br />is needed. <br />Mr. Luchini replied that the question would be better directed to the applicant to <br />address. <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS RE- OPENED. <br />Dr. Kenefick replied that it is a tough question to answer. She stated that for some time, <br />YIA has looked for an alternate location, partly because they do not have any outdoor <br />space that is usable, and there simply is nothing available that is within their financial <br />range. She noted that this is a small business so the options are very limited. <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. <br />Chair O'Connor asked staff if the real reason the findings cannot be made on the <br />outdoor play area is mostly noise or more about the safety with the truck traffic. <br />Mr. Luchini replied that it would be all the issues together. He indicated that if the <br />Commission is asking staff to give weight to one, the design and compatibility, given the <br />potential safety issues, would probably outweigh some of the noise concerns; however, <br />collectively as a whole, staff feels all of those issues have some weight as to why the <br />findings cannot be made. <br />Chair O'Connor inquired if there really is much of a safety issue, knowing that an <br />18- wheeler will be coming by three or four times a week after 5:00 p.m., or is the issue <br />because that could change in the future if Raley's sells and the delivery schedule for the <br />new company changes. <br />Mr. Luchini replied that it would be important to note that the area itself is not limited <br />specifically to delivery traffic. He indicated that there is parking in the rear of the <br />shopping center, so there are motorists coming and going throughout the day in varying <br />levels of traffic; it is a combination of both trucks and normal patrons of the shopping <br />center, employees, and things of that nature. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, November 12, 2014 Page 26 of 35 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.