My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 081314
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2014
>
PC 081314
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 4:19:41 PM
Creation date
8/10/2017 4:14:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
8/13/2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
`7 have looked at the rendering of the proposed modification of the Schmitt's home. I <br />actually think the architect has done a nice job of mitigating the visual impact of the <br />second story. But in the final analysis, the City of Pleasanton has deemed it a <br />second story addition. With the one exception in the last 20 years, all other requests <br />for second story additions have been denied. I fear approval of this second story <br />addition will mean the next second story addition will be approved and then the one <br />after that Those of us who bought in Rose Point for the privacy it affords in our own <br />backyards, will see that privacy eroded and the enjoyment of our homes diminished. <br />"Please again vote no on this request for a second story addition. Thank you." <br />Mr. Munn stated that he can appreciate what the speakers have said. He indicated that <br />they are not looking down into anybody's lot; they have roof on all three sides and it <br />would be pretty difficult to put windows in that. He added that they were very <br />conscientious of the privacy issues, and in talking circles about what happened before, <br />he is not sure all of that is exactly true. He indicated, nevertheless, that the property is <br />still zoned for two stories, and if they can mitigate the view and the issue with privacy, <br />he does not see why the additions cannot be approved. He thanked the <br />Commissioners for their time. <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. <br />Commissioner Allen stated that it is challenging for the Commission to evaluate cases <br />such as this where there are two competing neighboring points of view: the applicant's <br />right to build and the neighbor's right for a view, and a view is part of the design criteria <br />that the Commission is being asked to evaluate. She indicated that she visited the <br />neighborhood for the very first time this week to get a sense of the character of the <br />neighborhood and to see the story poles to get a sense of the massing. She stated that <br />she actually biked in the neighborhood and noticed that all of the two -story homes that <br />do exist in this neighborhood are on the periphery of the neighborhood. She noted that, <br />in fact, the two -story home in this area mentioned by one of the speakers does not <br />impact his view because it is at the very far north end of the property in the opposite end <br />of the hills. <br />Commissioner Allen stated that the character is mainly single story, most especially on <br />Hamilton Way, which is the core of that neighborhood. She noted that with respect to <br />the addition itself, she was glad she visited because the photos in the staff report did not <br />convey the magnitude of the addition. She stated that she initially thought that seven <br />feet higher was not very much, but when she saw the scale and re- reviewed the <br />diagrams, it became clear that the addition pretty much eliminates the view that the <br />neighbor has of the hills, a significant view impact as stated in the staff report. <br />Commissioner Allen stated that the other thing she realized by both listening to the <br />speakers tonight and her personal assessment is that this is a unique neighborhood and <br />that a lot of people who moved here may have done so because of the views and the <br />large lot sizes. She noted that there are other neighborhoods where views are not <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, August 13, 2014 Page 9 of 32 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.