My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 072314
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2014
>
PC 072314
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 4:17:34 PM
Creation date
8/10/2017 4:13:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
7/23/2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Acting Chair Allen inquired where the exit would be <br />Commissioner Balch stated that after hearing Mr. Tassano about how it could be designed <br />safely, he is tentatively fine with it coming to fruition. He indicated that he also drove it and <br />remembers it being a short distance between getting off the freeway and already being at <br />Stoneridge Drive. He added that the other thing that threw him off a little bit when he drove <br />it was that there was a lot of trucks traveling it at the time and a lot of people getting over to <br />those left -turn lanes to get into the outlets. He noted that it is a little busier for all of this to <br />come together, so he tentatively could see going forward with it. He indicated that he fully <br />understands the desire for it, but it has to be safe to get there. <br />Acting Chair Allen stated that she agrees it makes sense from the applicants' perspective, <br />and the key is to have a safe design that Mr. Tassano approves of and that all parties to the <br />agreement support. She indicated that if all that happened, she would be in support of it <br />unless a surprise came up somewhere else. <br />Commissioner Balch stated that Mr. Preiss' concern is valid. He agreed that Vulcan travels <br />that road quite extensively, so it needs to not be hindered and to have safe access. He <br />noted that he is sure Mr. Tassano would address that. <br />C. Are the building design, colors and materials, and height acceptable? <br />Commissioner Balch stated that he knows branding plays a big factor in the color, design, <br />and materials and that he is quite fine with these in general and finds them pretty standard <br />compared to similar dealerships. He added that his only comment, and that is because he <br />has been blinded by it before, is that he noticed this aluminum which is only on the <br />northern, eastern, and western facades of the building, and with that not being on the <br />southern side is good as it will not be blinding people walking towards the building with the <br />sunlight. In terms of the height, he stated that staff has probably worked through what they <br />find is acceptable and that he has no further comments on that. <br />Commissioner Piper stated that the design looks very nice, and the building itself looks <br />sharp and clean. She indicated that she is happy to have this in Pleasanton and added <br />that she is good with it as long as they do not put a gorilla on top of the building. <br />Acting Chair Allen stated that the building looked clean and like a professional car <br />dealership, and the only area she would like to see softened a little bit is on the Stoneridge <br />Drive side. She noted no one knows how long it will take to have another building there, <br />and the south side looked very, very stark with all the service bays. She added that <br />Stoneridge Drive is traveled a lot by both cars and bicyclists, so she would like to see more <br />trees and landscaping or something that makes the building look more interesting versus <br />so institutional on that side. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, July 23, 2014 Page 12 of 14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.