My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 072314
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2014
>
PC 072314
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 4:17:34 PM
Creation date
8/10/2017 4:13:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
7/23/2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
primary ingress off of El Charro Road. He stated that it might be something to be looked at <br />to make sure it is safe or to mitigate. <br />Regarding Lot 2, Commissioner Balch stated that he thinks it is well placed on the corner <br />and that the applicants have done a fair job lookir <br />three, he thinks the difficulty would be getting to L <br />noted that looking at the southern portion of Lot 1 <br />Lot 2, going to Lot 3 seems tight if that is going to <br />there were no ingress from El Charro Road. <br />g at that. He concluded that looking at all <br />it 3 from the CarMax shared line. He <br />which is also the northern portion of <br />become the primary entry for Lot 3 if <br />Commissioner Piper stated that it looked good and that she has no additional comments as <br />she has a very limited knowledge of car dealerships. <br />Acting Chair Allen stated that it looked good and that Commissioner Balch raised some <br />good questions. She agreed that people who go to an auto lot generally park and then <br />walk to all the places. She asked what the pedestrian route is and if there is some kind of <br />overlay circulation for pedestrians, and what that flow would look like in a way that would be <br />safe. <br />Commissioner Balch commented that the applicants have done a good job between Lot 1 <br />and Lot 2, where the parking for Lot 1 is designed so people specifically go to the Lot 1 <br />dealer and not to another dealer; however, getting to Lot 3 through the CarMax entry off of <br />Stoneridge Drive is a concern or something that needs to be looked at. <br />B. Does the Planning Commission support the Specific Plan Amendment to allow vehicular <br />ingress from El Charro Road subject to agreement by parties of the Pre - Development <br />and Cooperation Agreement? <br />Commissioner Piper stated that she has mostly shared her thoughts on this and that it <br />sounds like making those decisions are a bit far anyway. She indicated that she is very <br />curious as to see how that traffic study goes. <br />Commissioner Balch asked Commissioner Piper if she would support the applicants' <br />request for the ingress if they wanted it. <br />Commissioner Piper noted that the applicants want it. <br />Acting Chair Allen asked Commissioner Piper if she would support it if the parties agreed to <br />it. <br />Commissioner Piper replied that she certainly would support it if everyone agreed and the <br />traffic study stated it was safe. She stated that it makes sense why the applicants would <br />want that as it would be a lot to turn and then turn again to get into their car dealership. <br />She pointed out that the whole idea of having a dealership right on the freeway is so people <br />who drive by can get off the freeway and right into it; she just wants to ensure the safety of <br />other vehicles. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, July 23, 2014 Page 11 of 14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.