PC 062514 - Laserfiche WebLink

ultimately ask the Commission to make a recommendation to the City Council. He added that if the Commissioners do not have any particular advice or input at this point but there is more information they might want, sharing that with staff at this point would also be helpful. Commissioner Ritter commented that water is always an issue and that he knows there is the hundred -year drought right now. He indicated that he knows the City cannot plan for the hundred -year drought but just for the record, he asked, as all these houses are being added, how that issue or concept can be incorporated or what the State is telling the City to do in that regard. Mr. Dolan replied that this is obviously a very difficult issue, and the City is at a very difficult point in the timeline. He stated that the City cannot really put the burden of the long -term water outlook on these little tiny decisions; the water issue really needs to be tackled in its entire breadth. He noted that it is a regional dialogue at least with Zone 7, but it's also a State -wide dialogue. He pointed out that turning down or choosing not to do one little project in the City of Pleasanton is not going to solve the water problem. He indicated that it needs to be done in a way that is economically fair to everyone affected by it and at a much broader table. He stated that the City definitely needs to participate in that discussion, but he is not sure there is a lot that could be done with decisions at this level. Commissioner Ritter inquired if as the City starts adding more houses, the developer provides funding to fund the schools based on the number of bedrooms added. Mr. Dolan replied that the developer pays a school impact fee to the School District. He indicated that in fact, Pleasanton has something beyond the statutory authorized impact fee, and the School District has asked for and, in all cases, received a voluntary gift fee that goes beyond it. He noted that when new developers come to town they are very surprised to hear it. He added that he shared this practice with some of his fellow directors throughout Alameda County, and they are actually amazed. He reiterated that the developer contributes, and while it probably does not cover everything, it is more than any other community is getting. Chair O'Connor commented that there is no guarantee, though, that would continue. He noted that it has been such historically, but the City cannot force it if someone chose not to voluntarily increase those figures. Mr. Dolan agreed that the City could not. Chair O'Connor inquired if there are still voluntary increases in the affordability area, if the developers are still volunteering to pay above and beyond the statutory amounts in the 30- units -to- the -acre sites where they are wondering if it pencils out. Mr. Dolan replied that they volunteer after a long discussion. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, June 25, 2014 Page 25 of 29