My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 061114
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2014
>
PC 061114
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 4:15:44 PM
Creation date
8/10/2017 4:11:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
6/11/2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
honor the resident feedback on this one and that every little incremental increase makes <br />a difference, and the 1.5 percent is a difference -maker to her. <br />Commissioner Piper stated that in looking at the 1,000 -foot notification map, it appears <br />that well over 100 people were notified. She pointed out that two letters is certainly less <br />than two percent, which does not seem very much to her. She asked staff if that is that <br />about average, small, or large in terms of feedback. <br />Mr. Dolan replied that it is pretty small. He noted that if it were a big issue, the residents <br />would be present tonight. He indicated that if the Commission were concerned about <br />the traffic - calming project being critical and wants to know that it is moving forward, he <br />is very confident that the funding will be approved as part of the CIP. He added that to <br />make this project contingent on the funding approval might create some comfort to the <br />Planning Commission and would not hurt the applicant. <br />Chair O'Connor stated that he tended to agree with Commissioners Ritter and Piper and <br />respects what Commissioner Allen is saying. He indicated that he personally thinks that <br />1.5 percent is not very much, he does not have a problem with going ahead and <br />approving this proposal this evening. He added that the Commission will know on <br />June 17th whether or not it is funded. <br />Commissioner Allen stated that she could get behind this, especially since Mr. Dolan is <br />very confident that funding would be approved. She asked if the Commission would be <br />open to approving this contingent on funding being approved. She indicated that to her, <br />it is just a matter of principle, and she would not ask for implementation of this unless <br />she could at least approve it contingent on the approval of funding. <br />Chair O'Connor inquired if the applicant would be fine with not having a definitive <br />answer tonight. <br />Mr. Dolan replied that he does not think the applicant is going to have a sense of <br />whether or not it will be approved and reiterated that he feels confident that the funding <br />would be approved. <br />Commissioner Ritter stated that he did not think it was fair that approval of 40 additional <br />cars would be based on a traffic - calming plan that will be covering thousands of cars. <br />He indicated that he has a feeling that the City Council will approve it, and all would be <br />good. He added that it is not setting a precedent by approving a good business plan for <br />a service that is needed in the community. <br />Commissioner Ritter moved to make the conditional use findings as listed in the <br />staff report and to approve Case P14 -0753, subject to the Conditions of Approval <br />listed in Exhibit A of the staff report, with the addition of the four conditions listed <br />in the staff memo dated June 11, 2014. <br />Commissioner Piper seconded the motion. <br />Chair O'Connor stated that he would support the motion. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, June 11, 2014 Page 9 of 12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.