My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 042314
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2014
>
PC 042314
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 4:10:51 PM
Creation date
8/10/2017 4:08:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
4/23/2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
acre. He added that staff will be compelled to do some kind of CEQA analysis just in <br />case the City Council tells staff to proceed. He indicated that if the Council gives an <br />earlier direction not to proceed, then these will be excluded, but his sense is that the <br />Council might want to see the results of the CEQA before they actually make that <br />determination. <br />Chair Olson stated that he agrees with Commissioner Pearce relative to the CM Capital <br />site, given what the owner wants to do with the property. He noted that a couple of the <br />concerned citizens who live across the Arroyo stated that they could live with two <br />stories. He pointed out that that was one of the controversies looking at the Summerhill <br />Apartments, so he would certainly want to keep that one on the list. He indicated that <br />the Irby - Kaplan -Zia site just looks like a natural to him, noting that he walks by there a <br />lot, it is totally infill, and the City could benefit from it. He added that another one that <br />looks like a natural as well is the CenterPointe Church site. <br />Chair Olson stated that all of this tells him that the City needs to continue to work on a <br />Specific Plan for East Pleasanton. He indicated that while some have argued that the <br />City does not need to do that, he believes that it needs to be done in order to come up <br />with something that the City really likes out there rather than having it annexed by <br />another city. He concluded that what the Commission has heard tonight, including the <br />cross currents he discussed, argues that the City complete that Specific Plan. <br />Commissioner Ritter inquired if there are any of the sites that are more urgent where the <br />developers are ready to proceed and, therefore, need to be moved up to the "let's make <br />a decision" list. He noted that sometimes, something is approved and it does not <br />happen for eight or ten years. <br />Mr. Dolan replied that he thinks staff is not privy to that. He indicated that staff has <br />probably been working with the Irby - Kaplan -Zia property the longest because it was <br />involved in the last round. He noted that it is also a unique situation where there is the <br />opportunity to do all three together, and it is three families and not developers, and they <br />all agreed to go at the same time, which is a circumstance that exists right now. He <br />added that staff just assumes that everyone who submitted a letter wants to do it right <br />away. <br />Commissioner Ritter added that he also agrees with Chair Olson that the East <br />Pleasanton Specific Plan process needs to keep going just to have the plan ready <br />10 -15 years from now. <br />No action was taken. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, April 23, 2014 Page 25 of 27 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.