PC 040914 - Laserfiche WebLink

location, is design a program to meet on a regular basis with the neighbors and homeowner association to see what kind of concerns they have and try to work with them before the concerns become problems. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. Commission Ritter referred to staff's proposal to modify Condition No. 2 of the Conditions of Approval, showing redlined language in the event that the City receives complaints from neighbors. He clarified with staff that it is technically true with just about every project that comes before the Commission that if there are complaints from neighbors, the item is brought back to the Commission for reconsideration. Mr. Dolan said yes. Commissioner Pearce moved to find that the conditions prescribed in California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15162 have not occurred as described in the Addendum to the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (SEIR), and that the previously prepared EIR and SEIR, including the adopted CEQA Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations, and the Addendum to the EIR and SEIR are adequate to serve as the environmental documentation for this project and satisfy all the requirements of CEQA; to find that the proposed PUD Development Plan is consistent with the General Plan; to make the PUD findings for the proposed Development Plan as listed in the staff report; and to recommend approval to the City Council of Case PUD -98, the PUD Development Plan, subject to the Conditions of Approval listed in Exhibit A -1 of the staff report, with the modification to Condition No. 2 as shown in the staff memo dated April 9, 2014, and of Case P13 -2518, the Sign Design Review for the project, subject to the Conditions of Approval listed in Exhibit A -2 of the staff report. Commissioner Allen seconded the motion. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Commissioners Allen, O'Connor, Olson, Pearce, and Ritter NOES: None ABSTAIN: None RECUSED: None ABSENT: None Resolution No. PC- 2014 -14 recommending approval of Case PUD -98, and Resolution No. PC- 2014 -15 recommending approval of Case P13 -2518 were entered and adopted as motioned. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, April 9, 2014 Page 8 of 9