My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 022614
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2014
>
PC 022614
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 4:07:40 PM
Creation date
8/10/2017 4:03:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
2/26/2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
and would not need to use the alley on the south side of Buildings C and D along the <br />Arroyo. Pleasanton Garbage Service has confirmed that this layout works. <br />2. To reduce potential noise associated with the dog wash area, this feature has been <br />moved away from the southerly western portion of the site to the more central area <br />within the community. <br />In response to questions asked at the last Planning Commission Work Session with respect <br />to whether Buildings A and B would be visible when viewed from the southerly Parkside <br />neighborhood, Mr. Ebrahimi stated that they put together an exhibit that shows a line of <br />sight which reflects that at best, only a very slight view at the ridge of the buildings on <br />Buildings A and B is visible. He concluded by saying that Summerhill has been very <br />successful with their projects as they accommodate their neighbors while keeping their <br />projects economically feasible. <br />Chair Olson inquired how the school impacts are being mitigated and if there is a written <br />agreement. <br />Mr. Ebrahimi replied that the School District has a standard agreement that is based on the <br />particular site being developed. He indicated that after reviewing the agreement, it was <br />finalized; then they went to the School Board hearing, and the agreement was accepted <br />and has been executed. <br />Larissa Seto stated that staff will revise the section on the school impact fees in the <br />Development Agreement to reflect that there is now an agreement between the School <br />District and the developer, and the developer would be required to show that they have met <br />those conditions before they can pull building permits. <br />Pat Kernan, KingsleyBogard, Counsel to the Pleasanton Unified School District (PUSD), <br />stated that this is the first time PUSD actually has a mitigation agreement in place prior to <br />Planning Commission approval. He noted that Mr. Ebrahimi and John Hickey were very <br />proactive and great to work with. He indicated that this is a great project and that PUSD <br />looks forward to having them literally as a neighbor with Hart Middle School right across the <br />street. He added that the agreement with Summerhill, as well as that with Ponderosa, was <br />approved at the February 11, 2014 School Board Meeting, and PUSD Superintendent <br />Parveen Ahmadi just signed the mitigation agreements tonight before he came over to the <br />Planning Commission meeting tonight. He indicated that he will actually have counter- <br />signed and recorded documents. <br />Mr. Kernan stated that he knows Mayor Jerry Thorne said some very nice things about the <br />School District yesterday, and that tonight it is his turn to reciprocate some of the <br />comments about the City. He indicated that he was present for the Pleasanton Gateway <br />project when the rezoning of eight sites was launched. He noted that PUSD has been able <br />to get mitigation agreements with all seven sites; the agreements for the two BRIE sites <br />have not been signed, but they are in place, waiting for the project to move forward. He <br />stated that this is remarkable and that it would not have happened without a lot of people. <br />He thanked the developers; the attorneys, including Marty Inderbitzen, Larissa Seto and <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, February 26, 2014 Page 8 of 21 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.