My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 021214
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2014
>
PC 021214
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 4:07:00 PM
Creation date
8/10/2017 4:02:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
2/12/2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
assumed that not as many people are going to park or drive their cars and need to park <br />here. <br />Mr. Dolan added that if there had been a request for a substantial reduction in parking, <br />staff would have given that very serious consideration just because of the proximity to <br />the BART station. But that is not being requested, and the applicant is providing quite a <br />bit of parking. <br />Acting Chair O'Connor stated that he does not know what one space per 305 gross <br />square foot works out to for square footage but that it is not much of a reduction. <br />Mr. Otto replied that it is 55 spaces out of 3,270 that are proposed. <br />Acting Chair O'Connor verified that the City has a couple of other buildings that are at <br />85 and 84 feet in height and this one is only about 87feet. <br />Mr. Otto replied that it is 87'/2 feet tall; but it is 105 feet at its tallest point, which is what <br />is included in the measurement of the heights of the two buildings he mentioned earlier. <br />He added that the tallest building the City has right now is the Safeway building, which <br />is just down the street and is 85 feet 10 inches at its roof equipment screen. <br />Acting Chair O'Connor noted that there is a difference of about 20 feet. <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. <br />Brian Griggs stated that he has a real estate consulting advisory firm and has been <br />working with Workday for the past six years. He indicated that when Workday moved to <br />Pleasanton from Walnut Creek about five years ago, it had approximately 150 people; it <br />currently has approximately 1,500 people who work in the beautiful City of Pleasanton <br />and is hoping that this project will be approved and so it can continue its expansion. He <br />presented the Workday project team present tonight: Paul Ferrell with Form 4, the <br />architect for the building; Rich Sharp with Studio 5 Architects; senior people from <br />Workday, Jim Shaughnessy, who is part of the leadership and management team; and <br />Michelle Hodge who is a Senior Director of Real Estate and Work Places; Steve Hill, <br />representing the Stoneridge Corporate Plaza complex, which will be incorporated as a <br />unified campus. He noted that Workday already occupies some space in Stoneridge <br />Corporate Plaza already. He then acknowledged City staff with whom they have <br />worked collaboratively for the better part of six months to reach this point. <br />Mr. Griggs stated that Workday has no definitive plans about the timing of the project or <br />any preconceived ideas about potential consolidation of the project or whether they will <br />be able to lease space in other buildings. He indicated that that really is pretty <br />contingent upon the continued growth or flat growth of the company. He added that <br />they are also very pleased that, as mentioned in the staff report, they are going to be <br />providing a joint police facility for the City of Pleasanton. He stated that they have had <br />the opportunity to meet a half a dozen times with Pleasanton's Police Chief and several <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, February 12, 2014 Page 23 of 38 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.