Laserfiche WebLink
Commissioner Posson stated that he would like to explore the FAR issue further. He <br />recalled that what he heard Mr. Dolan mention was that the 25 percent was just kind of <br />what the Task Force thought was the right number. <br />Mr. Dolan replied that the Task Force made the first suggestion, starting with an average, <br />the type of information that, when there is a new home proposed and it is going to be <br />amongst a group of older homes, the Planning Commission and, if it moves on, the City <br />Council would want to know what the FAR of everything surrounding it is. He noted that <br />staff is constantly doing that chart and that it is very doable. He added that sometimes, if <br />the records are shady, staff has to estimate but it can get pretty accurate. <br />Mr. Dolan stated that in that regard, the Task Force thought that people are all already <br />taking this information into consideration and asked if it should just be the average, or if it <br />can actually be bumped up some and still be compatible. He indicated that somebody has <br />to be the biggest, so the Task Force decided to bump it up; 25 percent was the first <br />suggestion made, and it felt right to the Task Force. He stated that the Planning <br />Commission may feel better with another number, or the Commission can also eliminate <br />the Compatibility Standard entirely and just stop having discussions as to whether or not <br />something has to match in size and scale. <br />Commissioner Posson inquired what the FAR requirements are for residential areas in <br />other parts of the City and noted that he heard 40 percent mentioned tonight. <br />Mr. Dolan replied that 40 percent is the most common within straight - zoning districts <br />Commissioner Posson inquired why the variation from that in this specific area. <br />Mr. Dolan replied that in a newer tract home, the size and mass are pretty consistent just <br />based on the way they were built, and they typically have the same lot sizes as well. He <br />noted that there is some mix but not the dramatic variation found in the Downtown. He <br />further noted that other areas of town are just not as organic a neighborhood as Downtown. <br />Commissioner Posson requested staff to display the slide that shows the numeric value but <br />includes the comment on the exemption. He stated that where he is headed with this is <br />that should someone come in above that 25 percent, maybe with an exceptional design, <br />and it is consistent with the neighborhood, and it is going to be 40 percent above what the <br />neighbors have, how difficult it would be for them to get that exemption from that 25 percent <br />increase, and what hoops they would have to go through. <br />Mr. Dolan replied that if it became controversial they would go through the same hoops that <br />they would have to go through the way the regulations are now. He indicated that it will <br />come up to the Commission and possibly the Council to decide whether or not, based on <br />no specific criteria, they have met the challenge of being compatible in mass. He noted <br />that in the worst case scenario, the hardest thing they would have to do is prove what they <br />have to prove now. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, November 13, 2013 Page 32 of 50 <br />