My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 092513
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2013
>
PC 092513
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 3:57:17 PM
Creation date
8/10/2017 3:50:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
9/25/2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
45
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
number of people, both on the Task Force and in the audience tonight, that it would <br />start off with a level playing field. <br />Commissioner O'Connor inquired if it would be a 65/35 mix. <br />Commissioner Allen said yes <br />Chair Pearce asked Commissioner Allen if she is talking about at a 50/50 mix with an <br />option for 1,759 units. She noted that Option 5B seems to have that. <br />Commissioner Allen replied that it is really Option 7: a variation of Option 5B turned into <br />the Preferred Plan by shifting the mix. She noted that it would really be at a higher <br />feasibility with more units than are required. <br />Commissioner O'Connor stated that 50/50 is there, but what Commissioner Allen is <br />saying is to look at Option 5C and leave it at 65/35, but reduce the number of units so <br />the feasibility probability is the same as Option 5B. <br />Commissioner Allen agreed and stated that that is a simpler way of saying it. <br />Mr. Dolan stated that he understands the concept but that it makes things a little more <br />complicated, and he cannot tell the Commission what that reduction should be. <br />Chair Pearce asked how that could be figured out. <br />Mr. Dolan stated that it also begs the question. He asked if it is just swapped out for the <br />point that Mr. Costanzo raised about the value underneath the Transfer Station. He <br />suggested leaving the numbers the same and moving forward, but carrying that concept <br />forward as a part of the Commission's recommendation. He noted that the Commission <br />has a desire to reduce the number, and that can be figured out as it moves forward <br />when the numbers are real. <br />Chair Pearce agreed. <br />Mr. Dolan stated that there is this sort of imaginary level of confidence in the work that is <br />being done. <br />Commissioner Allen stated that she hears what is being said and that she is fine with <br />that as long as the notes also say that the assumption is it is covering the Transfer <br />Station. She indicated that she gets really nervous when this discussion comes up <br />about this number and then the Transfer Station is 80 or 90 on top of it. She stated that <br />the last thing she want for the City and the community is to have two different sets of <br />numbers so that it does not result in approving one and then another set of numbers <br />has to be added when everyone knows that the plan that is being developed is for the <br />entire East Pleasanton and the Transfer Station is part of that. She added that she <br />wants to make sure the number covers it all. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, September 25, 2013 Page 43 of 45 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.