My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 092513
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2013
>
PC 092513
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 3:57:17 PM
Creation date
8/10/2017 3:50:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
9/25/2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
45
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
everyone is going out of there. He noted that this is something that is going to be more <br />typical when this is completely built out, and just to qualify the two and to be fair, some <br />of the congestion at Santa Rita Road and Valley Avenue is due to the fact that that level <br />of service is failing. He further noted that there are improvements that are planned, and <br />as soon as the City Council approves constructing those, a lot of that congestion will go <br />away. He added that what looks really bad right now would not be so bad Santa Rita <br />Road and Valley Avenue were not backed up all the way down past Busch Road. He <br />stated that everyone that drives down that road, sees that every day, and that is <br />because of an intersection failure and not because that volume is on the roadways. He <br />pointed out that the volume question is right when one stands and look at the side of the <br />street, and that is the number of cars that should be expected there. <br />Commissioner O'Connor asked Mr. Tassano if he is talking about a development or a <br />developer funding most of the intersection improvement when he said the Council has <br />to approve the construction. <br />Mr. Tassano replied that the improvement for Santa Rita Road at Valley Avenue is <br />actually already approved and in the City's Traffic Improvement Fees. He noted that <br />every developer pays for the improvements identified in the Traffic Impact Fees, and all <br />the developers have already paid for the improvement at that intersection. <br />Commissioner Allen then inquired what can be done about this. She noted that <br />everyone wants to come up with an option that pays for itself and has the minimal <br />number of units possible, so she was looking at the question of what it means for every <br />single - family home that might be reduced against the 1,759 of the Preferred Plan. She <br />indicated that she just wants to confirm her understanding that for every housing unit <br />that is reduced against the 1,759 total units, about ten trips a day for a single - family <br />home, and six trips a day for a multi - family home would be saved. <br />Mr. Tassano confirmed that there will be fewer trips but he cannot say where there will <br />be some savings. <br />Commissioner Allen stated that her final question is one that has come out of the Task <br />Force and which the Commission has talked about before regarding senior housing, the <br />same concept as Sunflower Hills. She noted that there are certain types of specialty <br />housing that do not have as much of an impact on schools and on traffic to the degree <br />that those are specified within the development. She asked Mr. Tassano if she <br />understood it correctly that senior housing has only about one - quarter the impact of a <br />single - family home or about two trips a day or so. <br />Mr. Tassano replied that the trips per day is about 3.5, but for the peak hour, which is <br />what Commissioner Allen is probably referring to, it is about .25 per unit where a <br />single - family home is 1. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, September 25, 2013 Page 38 of 45 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.