PC 061213 - Laserfiche WebLink

adequate to serve as the environmental documentation for this project and satisfy all the requirements of CEQA; find that the proposed Development Agreement is consistent with the General Plan; and recommend approval to the City Council of Case P13 -1944, a Draft Development Agreement, as set forth in Exhibit A of the staff report. Commissioner Posson seconded the motion. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Commissioners Blank, O'Connor, Olson, Pearce, and Posson. NOES: None. ABSTAIN: None. RECUSED: None. ABSENT: None. Resolutions Nos. PC- 2013 -27 approving Case P13 -0543, PC- 2013 -28 approving Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map 8139, and PC- 2013 -29 recommending approval of Case P13 -1944 were entered and adopted as motioned. 6. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND OTHER MATTERS P13 -1858, City of Pleasanton, East Pleasanton Specific Plan Project update and discussion of four working draft specific plan alternatives for an approximately 1,100 acre area east of Martin Avenue and Valley Avenue, north of Stanley Boulevard, and south of Arroyo Mocho. Zoning for the approximately 235 acres of this property that is within the City of Pleasanton is P (Public and Institutional) and I -G-40 (General Industrial, 40,000 square foot minimum lot size). Brian Dolan, Director of Community Development, presented the staff report and explained why this item is on the Agenda again. He stated that at the last meeting, staff gave the Commission a status report on what the Task Force has being doing, the input staff has received from all the other Commissions and interested parties, and where the Task Force was headed as it geared up for a check -in with the City Council. He indicated that staff listened to the Commission's feedback, which included some great feedback and some actual substantive policy direction. He noted that staff did not necessarily absorb this feedback or respond to it during the meeting, and at a later discussion on the Commission's input, staff felt there were some things they wanted to circle back on with the Commission because they felt these were very important. He stated that this primarily relates to the theme that has gotten a fair amount of play at the Task Force and was really picked up on and reinforced by the Planning Commission: the idea that future development in the East Pleasanton Specific Plan area should be reflective mathematically in terms of the mix of single - family versus multi - family, similar to the rest of town, which is currently 75- percent single - family detached and 25- percent multi - family. He indicated that this is definitely possible and makes some sense, particularly in maintaining the character of the community, and is completely PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, June 12, 2013 Page 5 of 25