My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 061213
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2013
>
PC 061213
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 3:46:43 PM
Creation date
8/10/2017 3:41:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
6/12/2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
conversations with staff around what the Commission thinks staff could support or what <br />staff thinks the Council would also support, because what the Commission does not <br />want to do is start loading up conditions on projects and then have it reversed at the <br />City Council level. <br />Chair Blank stated that one possibility for the Commission would be to select two <br />Commissioners to work with staff, so there is no Brown Act violation, and put together <br />some ideas. He suggested that Commissioner Posson be one of the two <br />Commissioners. He added that he thinks water and energy conservation for new <br />development is a great idea and that that he is very supportive of it. <br />Commissioner Pearce stated she also does. <br />Commissioner Olson noted that there is a ticking clock here in terms of regulation, and <br />the Commission needs to get on it. <br />Commissioner O'Connor stated that the State of California will also be dictating on this <br />pretty soon. <br />Commissioner Olson agreed. <br />Commissioner Pearce asked Mr. Dolan if he had anything to add <br />Mr. Dolan stated that he sees this as a two- phased approach. He noted that there will <br />be two projects coming before the Commission shortly, and in the short-term, he thinks <br />continuing on with the conditions that were applied to the most recent projects is not <br />going to be a big surprise or overburden on these two projects. He added that then, <br />clearly, Planning has already been tasked with implementing some of the programs <br />from the Climate Action Plan, and many of them are worded, "Thou shalt create an <br />ordinance to do X," and some of those things are exactly what Commissioner Posson is <br />talking about. He noted that one of them was to revisit the point requirements in the <br />Green Building Ordinance, which staff will be working on. He indicated that he is <br />always concerned about staff resources, and these things will occur over time; in the <br />meantime, staff will be using the checklist it has prepared as well as some of these <br />additional conditions that have been applied and cover the gap that way. <br />Commissioner O'Connor stated that what the Commission has been hearing is that stall <br />is really pushing the envelope on development. He asked Mr. Dolan if these <br />developments are really viable with as much as what the Commission might ask a <br />developer to contribute; if, as the Commission starts loading more requirements on <br />development in the areas of energy and water and such, the Commission might have to <br />take away something that the City has been getting; if there is going to be a trade -off in <br />terms of how much the City can continue to load on to a developer if it is trying to get <br />additional low -cost housing out of the deal, or getting money for parks. He noted that <br />there are only so many dollars that make these projects viable and inquired if the City is <br />going to reach that point. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, June 12, 2013 Page 21 of 25 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.