Laserfiche WebLink
seems minor in the grand scheme of things, especially for what they are providing on <br />the site. <br />Commissioners Posson, Olson, and O'Connor indicated that they are fine with the <br />exceptions. <br />Chair Blank stated that he was fine as well. He noted that the Commission has granted <br />the exception for garage doors before with other projects, but he thinks the Commission <br />has not done the fingers before. He stated that the only other comment he would make, <br />just generally speaking, is that, when the project come back with the real application, <br />and it is really worth spending the dollars, the applicant get high quality visuals as much <br />as possible. He indicated that the Commission has had some really great visuals where <br />the viewer could actually drive down the streets and see the landscape. He stated that <br />it is really important for the Commissioner to make sure the landscape really does work <br />and that the applicant find trees on steroids. He commented that he wished the <br />Commission had specified trees on steroids for the Safeway development, but the <br />Commission did not know then that such a thing existed. He noted that the better the <br />quality of the visuals, the better the Commission will be equipped to go with the project. <br />He then addressed the applicant saying that he thinks the applicant got a good sense of <br />what the Commission desires. <br />7. MATTERS INITIATED BY COMMISSION MEMBERS <br />No discussion was held or action taken. <br />8. MATTERS FOR COMMISSION'S REVIEW /ACTION /INFORMATION <br />a. Future Planning Calendar <br />No discussion was held or action taken. <br />b. Actions of the City Council <br />No discussion was held or action taken. <br />c. Actions of the Zoning Administrator <br />No discussion was held or action taken. <br />d. Matters for Commission's Information <br />No discussion was held or action taken. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, May 22, 2013 Page 39 of 41 <br />