My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 052213
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2013
>
PC 052213
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 3:46:01 PM
Creation date
8/10/2017 3:39:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
5/22/2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Commissioner O'Connor stated that, again, he always likes bigger lots, but yes, he likes <br />it. <br />Commissioner Posson inquired how this compares with the density and lot sizes of the <br />houses in Walnut Hills. <br />Mr. Pavan replied that the density of Walnut Hills is 5.5 units to the acre, and the density <br />of the single - family detached for the proposed project is 4.9 units to the acre. In terms <br />of lot sizes, he indicated that the minimum lot size adopted for Walnut Hills is <br />4,000 square feet but really averages about 4,800 square feet. He added that it was <br />comparable to the proposed single - family homes of this project. <br />Commissioner Posson stated that he is good with it. <br />Chair Blank stated that they were acceptable. <br />Questions: Exceptions <br />5. Does the Planning Commission support arantino the exceptions from the <br />Standards: <br />A4.5. Where head -in parking occurs, a landscaped finger with street <br />tree is required an average of every ten spaces. <br />A5.b. Garage doors should be recessed at least two feet from <br />building fagade. <br />AB.b Publicly accessible parks, plazas, and /or open spaces are <br />encouraged for all sites greater than five acres, especially <br />those sites not in close proximity to public parks. <br />Chair Blank requested confirmation that with respect to parking, the applicant is <br />requesting a landscaped finger every 12 to 14 spaces, and that with respect to the <br />garage doors, the applicant is requesting that recessed garages not be required as they <br />face one another. <br />Mr. Pavan confirmed that both were correct. <br />Chair Blank stated that he was confused about the public accessible parks, plazas and <br />open spaces because the project is in close proximity to a public park. <br />Mr. Pavan replied that since the Commission has already rendered its judgment about <br />the adequacy of the open space, this probably has already been decided. <br />Chair Blank stated that the Commission will then consider just the first two exceptions. <br />Commissioner Pearce stated that she is pretty comfortable with these exceptions. She <br />noted that the Commission has granted more exceptions for a variety of developments <br />that have come forward and, quite frankly, if this is all the applicant is asking for, it <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, May 22, 2013 Page 38 of 41 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.