Laserfiche WebLink
5. CONSENT CALENDAR <br />There were no items for consideration under the Consent Calendar. <br />6. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND OTHER MATTERS <br />a. P12 -0556 and P12 -0557, Terry G rayson/Iron horse Development <br />Applications for a Conditional Use Permit and Design Review approval <br />to demolish the existing 76 Conoco Phillips service station sales and <br />restroom building, modify the location of fuel dispensers, construct an <br />approximately 1,950- square -foot convenience market, and install related <br />improvements at 4191 First Street. Zoning for the property is Service <br />Commercial (C -S), Downtown Core Area Overlay District. <br />Erica Fraser, Contract Planner, presented the staff report and described the <br />background, scope, and key elements of the proposal, including the differences <br />between the first and the current applications. She noted that staff has provided the <br />Commission with a memo tonight which adds a condition requested by the Police <br />Department prohibiting the use of blinds, merchandise, or advertising on the windows <br />so police have visual access into the interior of the store. <br />Commissioner Olson noted that reference is made to temporary remediation currently <br />underway. He inquired what the difference is between temporary remediation and <br />permanent remediation. <br />Ms. Frasier replied that at the moment, what the Regional Water Quality Control <br />Board (RWQCB) has approved is a temporary remediation of the site, and in the future, <br />the applicant will go back to the RWQCB with its permanent solution, which will include <br />removing the old underground storage tanks and various other methods to clean up the <br />site, after which the applicant will have to comply with current regulations. She noted <br />that the applicant might be able to speak better of this function. <br />Commission Olson inquired if the process of removing those tanks will interrupt the <br />construction of the store. <br />Ms. Fraser said no. She explained that the removal is actually part of the project and is <br />included in the project plan and that as part of the whole project, the applicant will take <br />out the existing tanks and install new ones. <br />Commissioner Olson concluded that permanent solution essentially means new tanks. <br />Ms. Fraser said yes, and more. She explained that there are other things the applicant <br />needs to do because it is more than just a tank problem. She added that they have <br />contaminated soil which will need to be cleaned up and contaminated ground water as <br />well. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, March 27, 2013 Page 3 of 48 <br />