My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 022713
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2013
>
PC 022713
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 3:35:49 PM
Creation date
8/10/2017 3:27:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
2/27/2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Narum inquired if the Energy Committee will be doing its own set of <br />priority recommendations. <br />Mr. Dolan said yes. He stated that he is almost sure that is correct and that he would let <br />the Commission know if it is not. <br />Commissioner O'Connor requested clarification that the Climate Action Plan will then <br />not need to be picked up or considered by the Commission. <br />Mr. Dolan explained that part of the Climate Action Plan is within Planning's area of <br />responsibility and there are some very specific things that will go through this <br />Commission; anything that requires an ordinance change, which happens to be in the <br />Zoning Ordinance, will clearly do it. He indicated that many of them are already <br />underway. <br />Commissioner O'Connor noted that the last time the Commission talked about the East <br />Pleasanton Specific Plan, he understood from staff that it was pretty well underway. He <br />asked the Commission if it really wanted to include that, considering that the <br />Commission wants to highlight only one or two items. He questioned if the Commission <br />would be diluting its No. 1 item if it throws an extra item in. <br />Mr. Dolan reminded the Commission that he did mention that the City Manager was <br />very happy with the single recommendation the last time. He added that he believes <br />the Commission's No. 2 and No. 3 items are underway and are going to happen; <br />whether or not they would dilute No. 1, he did not know. He noted, however, that there <br />is only one that is not underway, and the Commission has listed it numerically as No. 1. <br />Vice Chair Pearce stated that she would think the other two are just for emphasis. <br />Commissioner Narum agreed. She indicated that the Commission had good luck and <br />success with one item. <br />Commissioner O'Connor stated that maybe, as Mr. Dolan has suggested, the <br />Commission could put all the wood behind one arrow and give the Council a No. 1 and <br />then emphasize that the Commission really thinks the other couple of items are <br />important and to continue them. He added that he would hate to throw three things out <br />there and take something that is already well underway. <br />Vice Chair Pearce stated that it was her suggestion to do the two items the Commission <br />is already doing as an indication that the Commission is recommitting itself and believes <br />in that process. <br />Commissioner Narum commented that she did not think a 20- member Task Force just <br />stopping all of a sudden is not going to happen. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, February 27, 2013 Page 21 of 22 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.