PC 010913 - Laserfiche WebLink

Ms. Stern replied that it is "temporary" because it is on the model home and would be removed at the end of the function of that unit as a model home. c. Matters for Commission's Information No discussion was held or action taken. 6. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND OTHER MATTERS a. P12 -1778, City of Pleasanton Application for General Plan Amendments related to Alameda County's Updated Livermore Municipal Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan. Ms. Stern presented the staff report and described the scope and key elements of the application. Commissioner O'Connor inquired if the Airport Protection Area is in the same place. Ms. Stern replied that was correct. Chair Blank inquired if the safety zone has been renamed and re- jiggered. Ms. Stern said yes. In relation to Section 332.6 of the Plan regarding a potential flexibility under the Airport Protection Area (APA) to support modifications to accommodate a Transit - Oriented Development (TOD) or high- density residential development within the APA in Livermore, Chair Blank inquired if that means any high- density residential or strictly high- density residential associated with a TOD. Ms. Stern replied that it would be high- density residential associated with a TOD. Chair Blank inquired if high- density residential development cannot then be put there if BART does not come that way. Ms. Stern replied that was correct. She noted that the last paragraph of Section 332.6 on page 3 -10 of the Livermore Municipal Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (ALUCP) reads: "Should the City of Livermore, after adoption of this ALUCP, modify City of Livermore Resolution 192 -91, which establishes the APA, or adopt a new Resolution, the ALUC shall acknowledge the modification of the APA for purposes of transit - oriented residential development around the future Isabel /I -580 BART station in subsequent land use reviews, and shall revise this policy at the earliest possible date, as provided by state law." PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, January 9, 2013 Page 5 of 20