My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 121212
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2012
>
PC 121212
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 3:21:18 PM
Creation date
8/10/2017 3:11:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
12/12/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
With respect to the construction hours, Mr. Myers stated that he was fine with what was <br />discussed at the last meeting. He indicated, however, that the Greenes need to <br />understand that limiting the hours to 9:30 a.m. -4:30 p.m. may extend the construction <br />on the project. He recalled that the Greenes were concerned about how long it would <br />take to build the homes, and he wanted them to weigh those two issues. <br />Commissioner Narum inquired how shortening the construction hours by 90 minutes a <br />day would impact the time of construction of the house. <br />Mr. Myers replied that he had not really factored that in. He added, however, that it <br />would definitely add to the timeframe because they will have contractors in there longer <br />than they ordinarily would, but he cannot say specifically how many days that might add <br />to the construction cycle without sitting down and doing some calculating. <br />Acting Chair Blank asked Mr. Myers how long he anticipates the construction to take <br />without that shortening of the hours. <br />Mr. Myers replied that it would depend on the market: if the demand for the homes is <br />strong, all four homes could be built in the first six to eight months; but if the demand is <br />slower and they would have to build the houses one at a time, then it could be as long <br />as a year- and -a -half. <br />Anne Green, adjacent neighbor, thanked the Commissioners and staff for coming out to <br />their home to look at the story poles and for their input into this meeting tonight. She <br />expressed her appreciation for the efforts being made to mitigate their issues with <br />privacy concerns in terms of the closeness of the development and the fact that the <br />house on Lot 3 could be moved five feet over, the house on Lot 2 about 10 feet closer to <br />Sycamore Road, and the house on Lot 1 closer to make room for the Lot 2 house. She <br />indicated that she believes they could make do with the changes and that they would <br />still be able to see the Pleasanton Ridge. <br />Commissioner Narum asked Ms. Greene her opinion about reducing the size of the <br />window or changing its location or having frosted glass as opposed to installing <br />landscaping there. <br />Ms. Greene replied that she thinks landscaping makes sense for the new homeowners <br />and that they would probably prefer that. <br />Commissioner Narum asked Ms. Greene if her preference would be to have <br />landscaping put in as part of the construction. <br />Ms. Greene said yes. <br />Commissioner Narum asked Ms. Greene if she understands that lessening the hours of <br />construction would make a significant impact in the time construction would take in <br />terms of lengthening it. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, December 12, 2012 Page 4 of 40 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.