Laserfiche WebLink
Ms. Greene replied that it depends on whether one house would be built at a time or all <br />four houses could be done at one time. She indicated that she could see regular <br />construction hours if all of them are done at once; but if it will start going a couple of <br />years down the road, then they do not want to have construction noise next to their <br />bedroom wall, living room wall, and everywhere else all summer, particularly since they <br />have already been through quite a lot out there with the Greenbriar development and <br />the Sycamore Road construction. She added that they have been putting up with this <br />for a long time, and they really would like to enjoy their own backyard in the <br />summertime again. <br />Commissioner Narum requested verification from Ms. Greene that if all the houses will <br />be built at the same time, they would prefer to keep the 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. <br />construction hours. <br />Ms. Greene replied that based on their experience with construction on the other side of <br />their home, when developers are building that many properties, she understands that <br />the developer would need the length of day to get people in and out of the site; <br />however, if it is one house at a time and this will go on and on, she would prefer the <br />9:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. construction hours. <br />Mr. Myers stated that after doing some quick calculation, they have determined that the <br />revised construction hours would take out approximately 18 percent from their regular <br />construction time; so 18 percent will need to be added on, which would be <br />approximately an additional month to a month - and -a -half per home. <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. <br />Acting Chair Blank stated that he would like to make an opening comment that if there is <br />a litmus test, or if there's a cry for visiting a property or a poster child for presenting a <br />property, this one was it. He stated that when he first saw these plans, he was <br />convinced that Lots 2 and 3 were really the big problem; however, when he walked the <br />lot and spent a lot of time doing so, he did not see a problem with Lots 2 and 3, even as <br />they currently stand. He noted that Lot 1 was the big problem because looking out from <br />the Greenes' front yard where their pool area is, there is a very narrow view corridor. <br />He indicated that there are these beautiful tall Cypress trees, and the apex of the <br />building for Lot 1 would be about five feet to the right of the tallest Cypress tree, thus <br />disrupting that view. He stated that if Lot 1 could be moved five or seven feet towards <br />Sycamore Road, getting that apex right behind the Cypress tree, that Cypress tree <br />would be covering up the most disruptive part of the view and the Greenes would get a <br />much better view corridor. He added that he thinks the vegetation is a great idea, plus <br />the solid fence that would also be there. He thanked the developer once again for <br />putting up the story poles, stating that he is aware they were expensive but was money <br />well spent. He also thanked the Greenes for their hospitality and for keeping the horses <br />under control while they were out there. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, December 12, 2012 Page 5 of 40 <br />