My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 112812
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2012
>
PC 112812
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 3:19:55 PM
Creation date
8/10/2017 3:09:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
11/28/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Olson noted from the plans that the second - floors of all the houses are <br />bedrooms and bathrooms. He inquired if there were living areas upstairs. <br />Mr. Myers said no <br />Acting Chair Blank asked Mr. Myers if he had thought about putting up some story poles <br />and taking some pictures just so he would have a sense of what would be blocked and <br />what would not be blocked. He indicated that this is not the Commission's ideal solution <br />but that it is not all that expensive to do. He stated that that applicant can install them, <br />and the Commission can come out and look at the place. He added that it is a way to <br />quantify, and sometimes, once the neighbors see the story poles, they realize that it is <br />not as bad as they originally thought it would be. <br />Mr. Myers stated that he was open to that concept if the Commission thinks it is <br />necessary. He reiterated, however, that the project has some substantial setbacks. <br />Commissioner O'Connor asked Mr. Myers if these issues came up in his earlier <br />conversations with the neighbors or if tonight is the first time he is hearing about them. <br />Mr. Myers replied that they had conversations about them. He indicated that they had <br />actually staked a corner of the building when they were looking at the orientation of the <br />home and was sharing those plans with the neighbors as we went so he could educate <br />them a little about what was being doing. He stated that he showed them the elevations <br />and the setbacks, and they talked about the building a seven -foot tall fence leaving the <br />existing chain -link fence. <br />Commissioner O'Connor inquired if they had come to some agreement. <br />Mr. Myers replied that part of the feedback was that they were concerned about the <br />yards being close to their home, but expanding the footprint would bring the living area <br />and the outdoor living area closer to their homes as well. He reiterated that this was a <br />balancing act to arrive at that right mixture and thoughtfully incorporate everything into <br />the design. <br />Commissioner O'Connor noted that there were no view easements here but the Specific <br />Plan does reference trying to preserve views and includes a big section on the transition <br />area. He further noted that the homes coming in from Sunol Boulevard are all older <br />single -story homes, and further down onto Sycamore Road and Sycamore Creek Road <br />are the newer two -story developments. He indicated that he is now torn about being <br />consistent in the transition area, there being mostly single -story homes there on both <br />sides of the street. He noted that he can understand the argument in relation to the <br />Specific Plan, but it does not mean that there can be some variances from the Plan if <br />the Commission so desires. He added that he did not know if the Greenes really have a <br />view that the project is obstructing or if it is really less significant because they do not <br />really have a view. He indicated that he liked the idea of installing story poles because <br />they can answer a lot of questions when there are controversial things like this. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, November 28, 2012 Page 31 of 38 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.