My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 112812
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2012
>
PC 112812
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 3:19:55 PM
Creation date
8/10/2017 3:09:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
11/28/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mr. Myers continued that along the Greene property line, the first house on Lot 1 is in <br />front of that part of the Greene property that looks like a horse corral area, for lack of a <br />better word, so there is not much impact on existing structures. He added that more <br />attention was paid to Lots 2 and 3 with respect to potential impacts. He noted that on <br />Lot 2, they tried to keep the house close to the driveway, but the driveway unfortunately <br />got pushed away from the property line in order to avoid any impact on the trees along <br />there. He added that there is a 30 -foot setback to the structure, and on the <br />second -story portion of the structure, a porch encroaches into that 30 feet. He indicated <br />that Lot 3 has the same situation with a 15 -foot setback to the garage component and <br />29 feet to the second -story element, stair - stepping away from the Greenes' property <br />line. <br />Mr. Myers stated that they could have pushed the envelope and built much bigger <br />houses with smaller setbacks, but they tried to strike a balance between what was <br />permissible in the Specific Plan and what would work for the neighbors, and what would <br />preserve the trees on the site in order to come up with a good balanced project for the <br />City. <br />Commissioner Olson inquired if it is possible to increase the footprint and build <br />single -story homes on Lots 2 and 3. <br />Mr. Myers replied that it would be possible to do so, but enlarging the footprint would <br />actually bring the houses closer to the neighbors. He noted that on Lot 3, they had <br />some difficulty with the large oak tree and potential encroachments into the drip line of <br />that tree. He indicated that they are trying to preserve that and minimize impacts to the <br />tree as best they can. He added that building a single -story home would mean making <br />it as big as possible in order to be a pay -off on the value of the land. <br />Commissioner Olson inquired if one option would be to take out that tree. <br />Commissioner Narum inquired if that tree was the one pictured in the arborist's report <br />and called an unbelievable specimen. <br />Mr. Myers stated that he would not even think of removing the tree. He pointed out that <br />they are preserving the creek area in the rear and are trying to work within the <br />constraints of the site to come up with a project that makes good sense. <br />Commissioner Olson inquired if the all the trees on the Green property by the property <br />line are in the way of the Greenes' view. <br />Mr. Myers replied that he has not been to the Greenes' property to be able to say what <br />their views are or are not and that he would not want to speculate. He indicated, <br />however, that there are some nice trees there that provide some natural screening of <br />the proposed development. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, November 28, 2012 Page 30 of 38 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.