Laserfiche WebLink
2. The walkway was not offered as a public amenity; it was just something that staff <br />had suggested so it was incorporated in the plan. He plans to come back with a <br />proposal for a cash donation towards a park to be constructed on the property oft <br />of Vervais Avenue which is next to this site. <br />3. He will coordinate with staff to ensure that the Commissioners get to seethe <br />house. <br />4. He will look at the issues brought up regarding the site planning. <br />5. With respect to the density issue, he pointed out that it is probably going to be <br />one of the lower density sites in the area. They are really at 6.6 units per acre; <br />they should not be penalized because part of the property is in the creek. <br />6. The trees are really impossible to save on a site like this. None of the trees <br />proposed to be removed are native trees. They are all decorative trees that were <br />planted at some point by someone who owned the property, and a lot of them are <br />not in good shape. If a house were built that close to some of those trees, half <br />the limbs would need to be removed; actually grade the site and preparing for <br />development would require tearing out all the roots, so the trees would not <br />survive. But they will look into it to see if there are any ways some trees can be <br />saved, especially with re- working the site plan based on some of the ideas that <br />the Commission presented. <br />7. The FAR, in his mind, is adequate because this is what the market would like to <br />see here. In the context of what is surrounding this area, from an aerial <br />viewpoint, this site is probably the lowest density that is out there, except for a <br />couple of single family homes that do not have a lot of out buildings on the <br />property. <br />8. They will look at some additions and some more articulation and changes to the <br />architecture and some enhancements. <br />Commissioner O'Connor noted that a neighbor brought up the fencing issue and asked <br />what type of fencing is proposed for the project. <br />Mr. Schroeder replied that they had not gotten to it yet. He stated that they typically do <br />a standard good- neighbor redwood type of fence. He added that he is not opposed to <br />something other than that and that they have done other projects in town with masonry <br />walls, which are more expensive but are attractive to buyers because they look nice and <br />no maintenance is ever required. He noted, however, that it would need some <br />contextual analysis as to whether it is really appropriate to create that type of fencing for <br />this site. He further noted that they can also use an upgraded wood fence that is a little <br />nicer than the standard six -foot board -on -board redwood fence. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, November 28, 2012 Page 25 of 38 <br />