PC 112812 - Laserfiche WebLink

Michael Swift stated that he owns the property on the east side of the project site and that they are also looking at developing. He indicated that he bought the property about six years ago and plans to build on the property, expanding the actual residence there and having a big backyard for his children to play in. He stated that he was worried that there would be high- density buildings next to him with people looking into his backyard while his children were playing there. He wanted to be on record that he supports the proposal. He added that he supports this plan because it had nice homes in a nice development, and he would rather have that than high- density residential buildings. He expressed only one concern regarding the kind of wall or fence that would be installed between the two properties Mr. Schroeder indicated his appreciation for the comments on the historical property. He noted that he understands what the Task Force is doing, but he also thinks it is important to consider people's property rights when looking at historic property because this is about a subjective area. He stated that a lot of time, what is worth preserving or not is up to people's judgment, and that would be restricting people's rights. He indicated that this is one of those cases where he does not think it is a historic property. He noted that if this were something that were really valuable and could be a perfect example of a Queen Anne Victorian or a craftsman bungalow home with all the details, then maybe there would be incentive to spend half a million dollars to repurpose this house and make it something that could actually be sold to someone who would actually want to buy it; unfortunately, this is not the case, and neither he nor the property owner are willing to do that. Mr. Schroeder stated that, which it was not discussed, the reality is that the property owners could continue to operate this mobile home park forever, and it is actually worth more money as a mobile home park. He added that he could buy it and operate it as a mobile home park, but he did not think that is the best thing for the community. He indicated that he believes what would be best for the community is to add a plus through the creation of a new neighborhood on this site within the confines of the General Plan and bring the type of housing into the Downtown area that supports the Downtown businesses in the area. Mr. Schroeder stated that there are a lot of other houses in town that are worthy of preserving, but this is not one of them for a lot of reasons that he has already brought up and which, he is sure, will be discussing again. Commissioner Pearce referred to Mr. Schroeder's comment that the property could continue to operate as a mobile home park and stated that it was her understanding that the place was outdated, the hook -ups were from the 1960's, and unless it has significant upgrades, it could not be utilized as a mobile home park. Mr. Schroeder replied that it has a legal right to operate as a mobile home park and can still do so. Commissioner Pearce asked if this was true as a practical matter. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, November 28, 2012 Page 13 of 38