My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 091212
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2012
>
PC 091212
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 3:16:53 PM
Creation date
8/10/2017 3:04:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
9/12/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Ms. Ott replied that it is intended to apply to all kinds of noise. <br />Commissioner Pearce inquired if shouting on the property line would be an issue. <br />Ms. Ott replied that it would if it occurs for a sustained period of time. <br />Ms. Ott noted that Exhibit C of the staff report is a comparison chart showing what the <br />current code is compared to these guidelines recommended by the Task Force. She <br />continued that one of the Task Force members mentioned that not everybody in the <br />Core Area or in a certain area might be able to meet this exact standard, that given the <br />locational placement of a business having this activity, a lesser standard might be need <br />in order to meet the required decibel level at the residence line. She indicated that the <br />Task Force understood that businesses were not being given carte blanche to hit the <br />highest decibel level but that it was within context of the Downtown and all the other <br />guidelines that needs to be met. <br />Commissioner Blank referred to the comparison chart and stated that he has a vague <br />recollection that the Commission approved a recurring item, possibly the outdoor sound <br />stage in the back of the Barone's parking lot. He indicated that he thought there were <br />decibel limitations on that and asked staff if that was the case. He added that it might <br />be interesting to look at that as a comparison rather than at 355 St. Mary Street, as <br />Barone's was more of a broader use that might fall into the category that Commissioner <br />Pearce mentioned, because once the music is over, there could be 100 people <br />screaming. He stated that he does not remember the details of the use permit but that <br />there was a lot of discussion about measurement and where the measurements would <br />be taken. <br />Commissioner Olson concurred that it was discussed. <br />Steve Otto stated that the Use Permit for Barone's did not indicate a specific dBA; it just <br />has to meet code requirements. <br />Commissioner Blank recalled that there was some discussion about where it would be <br />measured or how often. <br />Mr. Otto replied that it would be per Code, depending upon which noise measurement is <br />being use, and whether the measuring is being made at the property line or over at the <br />residential district's property line. <br />Commissioner O'Connor stated that he recalled this was going to be done in the first six <br />months or something similar. <br />Mr. Otto replied that the Planning Commission had one recommendation that Barone's <br />was going to have to record the measurement, but when the City Council reviewed the <br />appeal, the applicants had proposed a sound wall and the conditions were changed <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, September 12, 2012 Page 9 of 35 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.