My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 032812
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2012
>
PC 032812
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 2:52:57 PM
Creation date
8/10/2017 2:46:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
3/28/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Pearce seconded the motion. <br />ROLL CALL VOTE: <br />AYES: <br />Commissioners Blank, Narum, Olson, Pearce, and Pentin <br />NOES: <br />None <br />ABSTAIN: <br />None <br />RECUSED: None <br />ABSENT: None <br />Resolution No. PC- 2012 -18 denying the appeal, thereby upholding the Zoning <br />Administrator's approval of the Zoning Certificate, as filed under Case P12 -0308, was <br />entered and adopted as motioned. <br />b. PUD -86, James Tong <br />Work Session to review and receive comments on applications for General <br />Plan Amendment and Planned Unit Development (PUD) rezoning and <br />development plan to construct 10 custom homes and related <br />improvements on the approximately 562 -acre Lin property located at <br />1400 Hearst Drive, generally located east of the present terminus of Hearst <br />Drive. Zoning for the property is Planned Unit Development -Rural Density <br />Residential /Open Space (PUD- RDR/OS) District. <br />Commissioner Blank recused himself due to a conflict of interest because he lives in <br />close proximity to the project site. He added that he would defer to his colleague, <br />Commissioner Pearce, to report on the Historic Preservation Task Force to the <br />Commission later this evening. <br />Steve Otto presented the staff report and described the site, layout, scope, and key <br />elements of the proposed project. <br />Commissioner Narum asked Mr. Otto to go back to the slide showing the two differing <br />measurements of the height of the houses and inquired if either measurement could be <br />used on the height measurement diagram. <br />Mr. Otto said yes. He explained that it would be a 30 -foot height, and if the house were <br />stepped, it would not be measured from the lowest to the highest point of the structure, <br />but the lower part of the house would be measured, and then the upper part of the <br />house, independently of each other in terms of height. <br />Commissioner Narum inquired if staff would not be concerned about the measurement <br />on the left in terms of the view impact. <br />Mr. Otto replied that it would depend on which part of the house is being looked at: if <br />the view of the house was coming from the right side of the diagram, there would <br />potentially be a larger height; but there is a benefit in having that allowance for <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, March 28, 2012 Page 5 of 33 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.